[CAUT] CAUT appropriate; was: How do you spell fraud?

[Richard Brekne]

Hi David,

I think thats a good point actually.  Sounds like something Andy might 
be able to change in the way responses to Caut and Pianotech posts from 
the archives behaves. They DO automatically carry the subject matter.  
I'm not sure whether an "RE:"  can be automatically added or not, but it 
would be appropriate if it could. Not only for your purposes but also 
for the way the archives are sorted when sorted for subject matter.

Cheers
RicB


    Whatever, the one problem I think I'm continuing to have using
    Eudora with the responses from archive viewing is that when you (and
    Jon Page) for example, respond to a thread, it does not appear with
    the prefix "RE:".  Take the difference between [CAUT]  Steinway
    repetition center pin height>Re: [CAUT] Steinway repetition center
    pin height.

    Eudora, at least, will see these as discrete subject groupings.  I
    don't know if other email programs do otherwise, but from my own,
    personal perspective, it can be confusing and frustrating when
    trying to follow a thread.  Thus, for now, I'm glad the archive
    viewing is NOT the default setting.  Totally selfish. I know.

    David Skolnik
    Hastings on Hudson, NY