On Dec 4, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Mccoy, Alan wrote: > Fred, > Try Scaleripper. You use a mac though and I think scaleripper is for > Windows only. Still this is a good program where you can experiment > all you want. Or Pscale, but it too is for windows only. > http://www.blademediainc.com/download.php > Alan Alan was kind enough to send what I originally asked for off list: a couple spreadsheets (in Xcel) containing all the formulae and actual entered data for real pianos. Two different spreadsheets (ie, set up differently with different formulae, one based on Dave Roberts done by Doug Rhodes, the other with the name Collins attached). I ran some sample figures, and it came out precisely as I predicted. I took sample notes, F5, C6, F6 and lowered the string diameter for each, then raised it. In each case, lowering the string diameter resulted in a lower calculated tension and a lower calculated tension as per cent of breaking point. And increasing the diameter resulted in higher calculated tension and higher calculated tension as percent of breaking point. I'd be happy to send these along to any skeptics who want to try for themselves. I am sure there are others on this list who already have their own spreadsheets, similarly populated with real piano (or harpsichord) data, who can try it out for themselves. I would be happy to hear of any results. I view the matter as settled, Ron Nossaman's carping notwithstanding. Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico fssturm at unm.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20091205/d44ee334/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC