We're (Brandon University) heading towards full-length covers as a means of slowing the exchange of air between soundboard and room. The situation then becomes semi-exposure (cover folded 1/2-way back in rehearsal mode) during the day, and fully-covered overnight... and that's presuming alot on the last student out the door. Nonetheless, we're trying to combat the net losses through the dry-heating season with "over-night recovery," rather than the micro-change between cover on/cover off during a tuning. Will let you know how it works after a year or two. best regards, Mark Cramer,RPT Brandon University/The Banff Centre for the Arts -----Original Message----- From: Ron Nossaman <rnossaman at cox.net> To: caut at ptg.org Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:29:46 -0600 Subject: Re: [CAUT] temperature and pitch Fred Sturm wrote: > No, I'm not making a case for anything, just trying to be sure I > understand the circumstance. I think that the confined system you > describe would obviously lead to a build up of moisture and heat, as you > describe, with the cycling of adding humidity and then heating to try to > reduce it. Seems a little counter to the design of the D/C system. I > remember reading about the 9 part system for the back side of uprights, > and how they would include a back cover, but it needed to be open by > some amount to allow for exchange of air. IOW, air exchange is part of > the way the system is supposed to operate. As I said, I was concerned when I opened one up and felt the warm moist air pour out. > I don't have any systems in pianos with floor length covers, so it > is an unfamiliar animal to me. I don't think I would be inclined to > recommend it. Actually, someone else recommended the full length covers, more to protect the case finish than anything else I suspect, but I've seen no reason not to after the fact. Time will tell, perhaps. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC