I don't see this as a wedge, but expanded possibilities. I would welcome
further training & tips in managing and maintaining a large inventory of
pianos, just as I have valued the concert prep classes, and the seminars at
belly shops. Technicians as a rule have no rule - there are those that just
tune & subcontract all other work, those that have limited workshops, those
that do institutional work, and those that do only private work.... The more
I know, the better I can diagnose, propose, choose belly shops to use,
decide whether I want to do University work. The more I know & can please
the consumer, the more work I generate for everyone. And take pride in my
own work. Nancy Salmon RPT
Frostburg State
University
rural Maryland
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:21 AM, William Monroe <bill at a440piano.net> wrote:
> I feel I must put a couple words in here, so that Mr. Sloane's query isn't
> ignored out of hand.
>
> This question has come up in my chapter as well. We worry a bit about the
> CAUT cert. being divisive. There is a feeling that it COULD serve to
> further separate "field" technicians from their CAUT brethren. That
> division is certainly already there in greater and lesser degrees, depending
> upon the technicians, and I worry that this may just drive another small
> wedge between these two groups of techs. I understand that is not the
> intention, but many times, the impact of something is far greater, or
> different, than it's intent.
>
> William R. Monroe
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Sloane, Benjamin (sloaneba) <
> sloaneba at ucmail.uc.edu> wrote:
>
>> Greetings, colleagues,
>>
>> I have a question. How many piano techs. on the CAUT list are doing
>> bellywork in the shop at their school, besides pinblocks and recapping
>> bridges? Are there statistics for this? Should we do a survey?
>>
>> If we are just contracting off what I believe is part of the second
>> year of training at the North Bennet Street School, is it really fair to
>> promote a certification that potentially could make those who do bellywork
>> look inferior to us? Is that in the best interests of all PTG members?
>> Assuming bellywork is not part of the cirriculum that is planned.
>>
>> Furthermore, I have been around the block enough for those who have
>> rebuilt enough actions to know, Stanwood provides no panacea. Sometimes an
>> action job just does not turn out well as we expected. For University techs,
>> usually we can find a place for the piano. For people in the field, the
>> pressure is much greater, for in many cases, we have no alternative but to
>> return it to the client as it turned out.
>>
>> I am concerned that we are going to make those not doing salaried work
>> for a University and College look bad with the CAUT certification. Is this a
>> valid concern?
>>
>> Respectfully,
>>
>> Ben
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20090623/92b652f0/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC