[CAUT] String Leveling question

David Skolnik davidskolnik at optonline.net
Mon Mar 9 07:32:54 PDT 2009


Thanks to all who indulged me on this without making me feel like J. 
Carson's Carnac (remember or google it).  Don Mannino wrote these 
perfectly lucid 'answers' on December 8-9 of 2008 titled, cryptically 
enough "String Level" (no wonder I couldn't find anything), and three 
months later I supply the question.  I should be syndicated. Still, I 
truly appreciated the additional information and perspective from 
those who responded, here (Fred, Tom, Wim) and on Pianotech.

Regards -

David Skolnik
Hastings on Hudson, NY

At 07:42 PM 3/8/2009, you wrote:
>On Mar 8, 2009, at 4:52 PM, David Skolnik wrote:
>
>>- What, ideally, should bi- and tri-cord level be parallel to?
>>keybed? stretcher? plate?  top of agraffe, (if not rounded, a la
>>Bechstein)?
>
>         In real life, I just try to see if the strings can be level 
> relative
>to the center of the earth, meaning the bubble is centered between the
>lines (most pianos are level enough for this to work just fine - if in
>doubt, put the level on the plate webbing in a few places and see what
>you see). Then the real fine adjustment is that all three strings are
>equally "muted" by the brass, with a subtle pluck of each string. I
>think a lot of people get hung up on some artificial standard of
>perfection, agonizing whether the piano itself is level and so forth.
>That isn't the point of the tool. The point is to get the strings all
>in one plane, ideally parallel with the top of the hammer (must be
>well filed), and at a right angle to the hammer's travel. But minor
>tilting isn't that big an issue - it's far better than the random
>condition it probably was in before. The main point is to have an
>efficient procedure to have the hammer strike all three strings
>simultaneously. If the strings are a bit tilted, you file the hammer a
>bit tilted. If the strings all center the bubble, you will likely have
>a very easy time mating. What you don't want is one string out of sync
>with the other two. So the real test is the even sound of each string
>on pluck, more than where the bubble is.
>         If conditions (agraffe drilling in particular) are such that it
>doesn't look like you will be able to get the bubble centered, just
>try to get the strings all in a line to the bottom of the slightly
>tilted gauge. It is possible to overbend the strings. And it is
>possible to get one string so high the others can't reach it (how
>would I know that? <G>) So subtle and discrete pulling is in order.
>         BTW, that electronic tool for string leveling that was patented and
>mentioned a month or two ago would use the keybed as the reference. On
>first glance, I thought it was crazy too complicated, but after
>looking at it more closely, I think it is simple and elegant and might
>work quite well.
>>
>>- How often do you come across ideal?
>
>Pretty often, but certainly not always.
>>
>>- How many times (at which points) do strings get leveled after
>>stringing?
>
>I like to wait until the piano has been chipped a couple times, and
>like to have it maybe 25 cents sharp, on the theory the bends will
>migrate as the wire stretches (so they should be at a "sharp" point in
>the wire), and making the bends will drop the pitch. That is to say,
>after bending I expect the pitch to be a bit sharp still, but I expect
>it to drop more or less to pitch over the next week or so, and then
>the bends will be more or less where they ought to be. I do a rough
>leveling then, not being overly particular. Then I do a fine leveling
>some time later before voicing. Over the lifetime of the stringing,
>there may be touch up of a few strings any time you voice.
>         BTW, I have read on this list a lot of fussing about 
> whether the tool
>is at the strike point. In my observations over the last few months,
>in most pianos it is possible to place the level either right at the
>strike point, or a mere centimeter or so in front of it for most
>unisons. So this is really a non-issue in most cases.
>
>
>Regards,
>Fred Sturm
>University of New Mexico
>fssturm at unm.edu
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.9/1989 - 
>Release Date: 3/7/2009 6:43 PM





More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC