[CAUT] Worn whippen cushions / VS Profelt

Fred Sturm fssturm at unm.edu
Sun Mar 15 09:17:09 PDT 2009


On Mar 15, 2009, at 7:59 AM, Chris Solliday wrote:

> you don't need to sand, retaining all material and removing the  
> indentation
> with the liquid swell is sufficient and allows the material to last  
> longer.

	OTOH, when working with letoff punchings, it does make sense to sand  
a bit. The idea being that you want the same amount of material  
everywhere, and some fibers will have disappeared from the dent or  
dents. So you want to remove that same amount of fibers from the rest  
of the surface. When you turn the button, it is likely that a slightly  
(or dramatically) different area of felt will contact the jack tender.  
If everything is as even as it can be, you will have more stable  
regulation.
	For the wipp cushion, if the dimple is fairly deep, my notion is that  
there is some additional friction because more surface area of the  
cushion is contacting the capstan. So a bit of sanding isn't a bad  
idea (and then iron down the fibers). You don't sand in the middle of  
the dimple, just the thicker cloth around it. Ideally you replace the  
cloth when it is at that point. I guess the same would really hold for  
moderate dimpling. Ideally you have two convex surfaces contacting  
each other. It doesn't last, whatever you do.
	But lubrication is more important: prevention rather than cure. For  
me that means teflon powder on felt, McLube on metal (and polished  
metal without corrosion or burrs). Both wear and compaction can be  
reduced by a lot even with extra heavy use. Re-swelling felt is a good  
method of getting more quality life out of parts, but you get more  
bang for the buck out of lubrication.
Regards,
Fred Sturm
University of New Mexico
fssturm at unm.edu





More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC