I would like that first sentence a lot better if it read:
"The energy from the string, which doesn't have enough
[surface area] to move very much air, is transferred to the
soundboard which does."
The soundboard is not increasing the volume of sound--it is
creating the sound. So, I'd like the second sentence better if it read:
"So the ... volume of sound is [high] because the soundboard,
whose total energy output is less than what the string
started with, is ... efficient at moving ... air even [though]
energy [has been lost in the process]."
ddf
| -----Original Message-----
| From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On
| Behalf Of David Love
| Sent: May 07, 2009 10:44 PM
| To: caut at ptg.org
| Subject: Re: [CAUT] Accujust and grunting fish bait
|
| The energy from the string which doesn't have enough mass to
| move very much air is transferred to the soundboard which
| does. So the increased volume of sound is because the
| soundboard, whose total energy output is less than what the
| string started with, is more efficient at moving more air
| even with less energy. It's not really amplified in the same
| what that, say, an electric guitar is amplified. But the
| soundboard does make the vibrating string louder, just not
| amplified. Terminology issue. The vocal cord thing and
| creating an area in the throat that produces some resonance
| is something slightly different again.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut_ptg.org/attachments/20090508/636a7fba/attachment.html>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC