I agree with your assessment of the romantic period and the prevalence of diatonic keys. The argument for UETs, in my view, lies in the contrast or "color" variations that the different thirds characteristics give to each key. Thus, for example, when modulating from the tonic in a "less harsh" key to a "more harsh" key, the return to the tonic creates a quiet but convincing homecoming of sorts. Unfortunately that doesn't hold true if the tonic happens to fall in one of the outer or harsher keys, as you've mentioned. There are countless examples of that in the Romantic literature (and beyond) and, in my view, UETs are much less successful there. However, I would argue from this particular aesthetic viewpoint that even in the most famous piece of Baroque literature (the WTC 48 preludes and fugues) the use of UETs doesn't always hold up well either when the outer keys are considered. The P/F #8 in Eb minor/D# minor of book one comes to mind and there are others. But this ventures now into the realm of personal taste (which is probably where it belongs) and I'm willing to confess to mine even as I find UET's of interest for various other reasons. Clearly there are different methods of dealing with temperaments and the aesthetic merits of each can be argued. Beyond that, however, the general answer to the claims seems to be "it depends". David Love www.davidlovepianos.com Temperament history is another question, and David Love's statements above are very much in agreement with the available historical documentation. My comments/assertions up to this point are more to the statement that "WT sounds less harsh" based on a supposed prevalence of diatonic keys in common practice music for piano. That claim (prevalence of diatonic keys) holds for the classical period and before. It does not hold for the romantic period and after. Common practice music referring to what professional pianists perform as a general rule (not necessarily to all the literature composed and printed during the period, which might well have a bias towards "easier" keys, because of being aimed at a public for whom "lots of sharps or flats" would be beyond their capabilities to read and play). If one prefers WT, well and good. It is in the variety, not the overall number of major third beats that the difference lies, if we are talking about the romantic literature (which seems to be pretty much the bulk of what gets performed). Regards, Fred Sturm fssturm at unm.edu "I am only interested in music that is better than it can be played." Schnabel
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC