[CAUT] F..riction (rep spring)

David Stanwood stanwood at tiac.net
Wed Dec 1 09:55:27 MST 2010


Fred and Alan,

This could be another thread but here's my 2 cents...  We find 
ourselves in situations sometimes when the rep spring lifts the 
hammer in a nice controlled motion upon release from the back check 
yet the jack still cannot be made to return under the knuckle... even 
to the point were the repetition lever height adjustment button is 
completely off it's rest pad to no avail.   Repinning the rep lever 
can sometimes make this symptom disappear.  Is this what you're 
referring to Fred?

My take on it is that when this happens it indicates that the wire 
size of the repetition spring is to high so that when it even just 
starts to work it's already too tight after going just a little way 
into its arc, so it's kind of on the edge of starting to work.. 
switching to a smaller spring size will solve to problem or going 
with a heavier hammer...

When the hammer weight and spring size is matched the rep lever will 
work with low friction.

David Stanwood

>Fred,
>
>By "pinning those reps heavy" do you mean tighter pinning? Can you 
>put a number on it, as in what do you aim for in pinning rep levers? 
>I know that some go for pinning reps at about 8g, but on nearly 
>every new set of wips I've encountered the reps are pinned in the 
>0-1g range, at least when I get them. I don't know what the 
>manufacturer aims for.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Alan
>
>
>Certainly pinning those reps heavy makes it easy from the 
>technician's point of view, to set springs so the hammer rises 
>nicely in our artificial emulation. And I have found situations 
>where heavier pinning was necessary to get the jack to re-set under 
>the knuckle consistently.



More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC