[CAUT] Knuckle Direction

[Norman Cantrell]

I just performed a "cat scan" on one of my felines as a method of research.  Rubbing against the nap definitely increased the energy in the "attack" while rubbing with the nap on the return stroke seemed to set the stage for additional repitition (at least in her mind)
 
Just a thought
 
Norman Cantrell 

--- On Tue, 6/1/10, Jim Busby <jim_busby at byu.edu> wrote:


From: Jim Busby <jim_busby at byu.edu>
Subject: Re: [CAUT] Knuckle Direction
To: "caut at ptg.org" <caut at ptg.org>
Date: Tuesday, June 1, 2010, 5:29 PM


Nap. That's the word I wanted. Grain got the idea across. After seeing many pianos with it one way on one, the other on another, I agree. Doesn't seem to do diddly.

I need a nap too.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Ron Nossaman
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 3:22 PM
To: caut at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [CAUT] Knuckle Direction

Jim Busby wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> I've heard both arguments "this way and the jack slips out
> better" and "that way and it gets returns better,
> especially on a soft blow". In a class I took years ago
> (can't remember who but he was good, and it made sense) he
> said his company did a lot of testing and it didn't seem to
> matter, but that they all should be the same.
> 
> That being said, I just looked at some new Renner knuckles
> and they are installed so that the jack goes OUT with the
> grain and returns AGAINST the grain. To me this is
> counterintuitive. I looked at another piano and they were
> backwards from that. Go figure.

It's yet another of the many "intuitive" things we worry 
about. I'm in the "doesn't matter as long as they're all the 
same" category. The reason being that in play, the jack is 
being pushed away from the knuckle on return, and isn't really 
dragging whichever way the nap points.
Ron N
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20100601/92319564/attachment-0001.htm>