Haven't the hammers been reshaped a few times? We have for use a CFIIIS from Yamaha's concert stock at the SF Ballet. Last year I complained about the piano was going downhill, after several years. Yamaha, after getting quotes in the Bay Area, sent up Dave Reed. He spent a weekend installing the pre-hung hammer, shank and flanges and going through the work. A different piano. I would think a 2004 CFIII could use the same thing. If Yamaha sent a fellow for a couple of days, I would imagine all that can be done to those hammers has been done...you might try deep shoulder needling, 6 mm, 3 needles, at least 12 strikes, starting in the tenor and listen to the difference in tonal structure. I find the predominance of high partials, which decay quickly, are reduced and fundamental/mid-range are brought forward. Listen for the tone change to "above" the strings. This is the projection you need. David Ilvedson, RPT Pacifica, CA 94044 ----- Original message ---------------------------------------- From: "Dempsey Jr., Paul E" <dempsey at marshall.edu> To: pianotech at ptg.org Received: 3/22/2010 9:04:53 AM Subject: [CAUT] Yamaha CFIIIS >All, >We have a Yamaha CFIIIS that was purchased in 2004. When it arrived, everyone, >and I mean everyone (Students, faculty, and guests), forsook the 42 year old >Steinway D that it shares the stage with in favor of the new, "shiny" piano. >Slowly but surely they all came back to the Steinway. Reasons varied, but the >common thread was that the Yamaha lacked the power of the S&S, and had no >"personality" so the CFIII was orphaned in favor of the D. A tech from Yamaha >visited and spent two days with the piano but everyone still goes with the old piano. >So, we are in spring break and I have some time to devote to the Yamaha-reshape >hammers, reg and lube, mate strings and voice. You know the drill. >I am noticing that the hammers are hung with a slight distal angle (about 3 degrees) >Is this normal for the CFIII? Also, looking at the string impressions in the strike point >(they aren't too bad really), it appears that the hammers are very slightly over >centering. >Is the 3 degree bore angle correct? I guess I need to confirm the proper bore >distance too. There is no $$$ for new hammers. >Thoughts? >Paul E. Dempsey, RPT >Piano Technician Sr. >Marshall University >Huntington, WV >304-696-5418 >304-617-1149
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC