Although, those three notes are a pain to restring, given that they're under the bass strings and have to be hitched in that "golden pond" area. On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Ed Sutton <ed440 at mindspring.com> wrote: > Paul- > > When the M was strung with standard piano wire, it had no broken strings > after 75 years. > When it was strung with Pure Sound, high treble strings broke > spontaneously, ping-in-the-middle-of-the-night. > I think the appropriate use of Pure Sound is in low tensioned, 19th century > instruments. I have had good success in that application. > > Pure Sound is prone to break at the becket, and at the back of the > hitchpin. When you bend it back and forth, you can feel that it is much > softer than standard piano wire. > > In instruments where the lowest tenor notes are short scaled (low tension), > it might be an alternative to wound strings. > You could try Pure Sound on the first three lowest plain wire notes of the > B. It will probably make tuning easier, and if they break, you've only got > three notes to restring. > > Ed > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Paul T Williams <pwilliams4 at unlnotes.unl.edu> > *To:* caut at ptg.org > *Sent:* Monday, May 10, 2010 8:46 AM > *Subject:* Re: [CAUT] Pure Sound Wire > > Fred, > > Curious, as I'm planning on doing this same project on a early 80's B this > summer, what year was this piano of yours? Thankfully, (Thank you, Richard > West), the action was de-tefloned before my starting here and I replaced the > hammers last year, but still many broken strings on the capo area. I want to > nip this one in the bud. I replace at least one string every other week in > this piano professor's studio. They might lessen, just because the main > piano pounder was an energetic GTA who's now graduated! > > Richard put forth another issue that some of you might know more > about...that the plate was origianally located poorly. How much would this > problem affect string breakage? Could it also affect that strange sound from > F2 that happens on all of our 70's and 80's Steinway B's? > > Best, > > Paul > > > > From: > Fred Sturm <fssturm at unm.edu> > To: Ed Sutton <ed440 at mindspring.com>, caut at ptg.org Date: 05/09/2010 09:02 > PM Subject: Re: [CAUT] Pure Sound Wire > > ------------------------------ > > > > On May 9, 2010, at 7:51 PM, Ed Sutton wrote: > > A few years ago Pure Sound wire was being promoted as suitable for use on S > & S M pianos. > Has anyone tried it? > Have you had breakage problems? > Thank you. > > Ed Sutton > > I experimented with Pure Sound on a B a couple summers ago (piano in a > classroom). I will be restringing the treble sections (capo) this summer. > Far, far too much breakage. Tenor is great, and does sound noticeably better > (well, it's subtle, but better - clarity and sustain, as well as a better > inharmonicity match, and F2 area tunes much more easily). But the breakage > in the capo section has been nearly 50%, compared to maybe as much as 5% > (mostly much less) in pianos with standard wire. No broken strings (so far) > in the tenor (up to C#5). > I should note that I did use the extra strong wire as recommended as well > as recommended scaling. > Regards, > Fred Sturm > *fssturm at unm.edu* <fssturm at unm.edu> > *http://www.createculture.org/profile/FredSturm*<http://www.createculture.org/profile/FredSturm> > *http://www.youtube.com/fredsturm* <http://www.youtube.com/fredsturm> > *http://www.cdbaby.com/Artist/FredSturm*<http://www.cdbaby.com/Artist/FredSturm> > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20100510/d25ead13/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC