In a message dated 5/11/10 1:57:33 AM, WOLFLEEL at UCMAIL.UC.EDU writes: > Jim, > > With all due respect, are you writing this on behalf of the Board, the > Bylaws Committee, or just voicing your own opinion? > > Eric; I shill for no one. If I write it it is my thoughts, opinions and/or questions. You know that and I wonder why you felt it needful to insert such? Yes I have seen the cirriculum and am suitably impressed. It is well thought out and covers needful territory. I can see where following such would be helpful to CAUT types. As I understand the quarterly reports to the Board they were to be touch points in the development of the CAUT thingee so that Board could offer their guidance and thoughts as the proposal was being developed/changed...Am I wrong here? As I understand it the only thing submitted to the Board were done so as fait acompli.... I don't know this for a fact as I am not privy to CAUT COM/BOARD communications. If this is so there must have been little chance for Board to offer guidance. "For people starting off in institutional work or seeking to advance to better positions, the incentive to gain the specialized knowledge we can impart and share in this manner could be invaluable." Does this mean that without a CAUT endorsement that the cirriculum will not be used? I will write no more on this subject on CAUT at ptg.org...thank you for your forbearance. Jim Bryant (FL) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20100511/bf2702bd/attachment-0001.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC