Double dog dittos Doug. Well said. I've said similar things but nobody listens to me. :) I here so many guys curse lacquer and nary a dismal word about a mind numbing 200 needle strokes a hammer or another step towards carpal tunnel syndrome. The intelligent judicious use of thin solutions is acceptable and workable. It is the over use and unintelligent applications od solutions into hammers which IMO should possibly be declared defective from the git go that mystifies me. I think we need some classes on the subject and stop ignoring it like its the stepchild of voicing. It is a tool and the misuse of tools often leads to failure or injury. FWIW. I probe each set of hammers with a no 6 needle to check for an adequate density whether it be Hot pressed, or luke warm pressed, before I ever commit to them. Sent many sets of each type back if they failed the test. Its too much work and its too important to be successful and foolish to risk failure with the clients money Dale S. Erwin www.Erwinspiano.com Doug wood To: College and University Technicians <caut at ptg.org> OK, while I'm on a roll here. I guess I really don't see that the variance in need for lacquer is really all that different from the variance in need for deep shoulder needling on the hard-pressed hammers. I've heard reports from 20 to 200 blows in each shoulder, depending on source and hammer set. ?? I realize that I'm speaking from mostly ignorance here, as most of my work involves lacquered hammers. But is it really so different that one set of hammers will be fine with 2 or 3 visits with the lacquer, and another require 7 or 8? Doug ********************************* Doug Wood Piano Technician School of Music University of Washington dew2 at uw.edu doug at dougwoodpiano.com (206) 935-5797 ********************************* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20110217/90acef7b/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC