[CAUT] Mold mitigation

David Skolnik davidskolnik at optonline.net
Sun Jan 13 06:26:32 MST 2013


Greg -
How is he coping during this period of strategizing? It seems like 
this becomes a de facto trial.
James Schmit  - can you identify some of those cutting edge 
techniques you referred to?

David Skolnik
Hastings on Hudson, NY

At 03:25 PM 1/11/2013, you wrote:
>Wim, a follow up here, as I see my original to you reply didn't go 
>to CAUT.  This is a Cable grand, near 6'.  The customer knows (we've 
>had a conversation) it really isn't worth rebuilding completely, and 
>so until he works through the nightmare of logistics that he may 
>face if he decides to keep it and try to "treat" it instead, that 
>sort of ends the conversation, I guess.
>Thanks for yours, and everyone's help and input!
>Greg
>
>
>On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:12 PM, 
><<mailto:tnrwim at aol.com>tnrwim at aol.com> wrote:
>Greg. Would you mind telling us the name of the piano?  Is it worth 
>it to completely rebuild, new finish, new strings, etc. new action?
>
>Wim
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On Jan 10, 2013, at 3:06 PM, "Gregory J. Granoff" 
><<mailto:Gregory.Granoff at humboldt.edu>Gregory.Granoff at humboldt.edu> wrote:
>
>>I don't think you missed anything, but I think what I failed to 
>>make clear is that he really likes this piano--though it is a 
>>fairly indifferent and generic late 20's 5' 9-ish grand that had an 
>>action rebuild only a few years ago.  Thus, though money is indeed 
>>not really the issue, there remained a desire to see if a proven 
>>route to decontaminating the piano was available that didn't 
>>involve rebuilding.  My (and his) interest was in knowing if, 
>>specifically, a reliable method for doing this existed, and what it 
>>would be, and did anyone have experience with this.  I am not under 
>>the impression that the piano itself is suspected to be the actual 
>>source of the problem, but rather being in the same environment, 
>>thoroughness of remediation demands that something be done with 
>>everything in the home that could be affected--whether actually needed or not.
>>
>>  He will undoubtedly not decide what to do until some 
>> information/recommendation from me is forthcoming, though, 
>> again,  if I say, "buy another piano, because that's the easiest 
>> route", (and that seems like it might be the emerging consensus) 
>> he's likely to consent, because, of course, that option was always 
>> there.  But I agreed to find out what the CAUT community at large 
>> knew, and everyone's take on it was of value to me, whether they 
>> thought they were addressing the central issue or not.  In fact, 
>> for me, sometimes misunderstandings can generate new views on the 
>> proceedings that shed light where not originally expected.
>>
>>I agree that knowing what it would cost to get a professional to 
>>assess and treat (if possible) the instrument would be of great 
>>interest.  An ozone tent was mentioned, and I'm going to follow 
>>that up a bit out of curiosity and see what I can turn up.  I'll 
>>let the list know if anything comes of it.
>>
>>He mentioned to me the idea of selling it to a friend who knows 
>>exactly what's going on, has been in his house a lot and has no 
>>symptoms, and wants a piano.  A scenario like this could skirt the 
>>ethics issues you bring up quite easily, and might be the only 
>>recourse if the legal/ethical problems of trying to avoid outright 
>>destruction of the piano became too weighty.
>>
>>Greg
>>
>>
>>On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:06 PM, David Skolnik 
>><<mailto:davidskolnik at optonline.net>davidskolnik at optonline.net> wrote:
>>Sorry if I'm missing something.  If money is, as they say, 'no 
>>object', then let him get another piano, or another house, 
>>whatever.  If money is 'an object', then the question is, what is 
>>the most efficacious way of determining if the piano is 
>>contributing to his problem?  Either remove the piano, temporarily 
>>(he could rent something if need be), or wrap it.  However, you say:
>>
>>>  I suspect he's decided that the piano will either be treated in 
>>> some tried and proven way, or be rebuilt or replaced
>>
>>So if he's already decided what he wants to do, it becomes an issue 
>>of little further interest.  It would be of interest to know how 
>>much it would cost to have a certified individual determine the 
>>piano's toxicity, and if any, how much it would cost to remediate 
>>(and how it would be done).  For that matter, it would of more than 
>>passing interest to contemplate the ethics of disposing of such an 
>>instrument.  Can you sell it without disclosing your reason?  If it 
>>is contaminated, can you donate it?  etc.
>>
>>It reminds me of my experience (which I've cited before) dealing 
>>with a piano that had been treated with (what turned out to be) 
>>Paris Green, a substance containing arsenic, which had been used, 
>>especially in the south, to control insects.  Once officially 
>>identified (by village fire department), the legitimate (legal) 
>>recourse asserted itself.  A company was brought in to inspect, and 
>>subsequently advised removing (and disposing of) the piano, a step 
>>which, frankly, had I continued to be involved in the process, I 
>>would have at the very least, challenged.  I retain some degree of skepticism.
>>
>>My last word:  whatever.
>>
>>David Skolnik
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>At 02:26 PM 1/10/2013, you wrote:
>>>David,
>>>You're correct, there was no mention of water damage.  The house 
>>>is fine from that perspective, as far as anyone knows.  As I said 
>>>to James in my response to him, the issue is probably the Humboldt 
>>>climate well known for dampness, especially along the coast where 
>>>we are.  He is a musician, records, gigs, and uses the piano 
>>>frequently, though as he is more a wind player and guitarist, and 
>>>associates are more likely to use the piano than he in actual 
>>>rehearsals and so forth.
>>>All your suggestions are useful, but I suspect moving the piano to 
>>>a different local in the house probably isn't going to fly, since 
>>>I suspect he's decided that the piano will either be treated in 
>>>some tried and proven way, or be rebuilt or replaced.   No one has 
>>>any idea whether the piano is even infected; they just want to 
>>>cover all the bases in
>>>the most direct way possible.  I'm getting the feeling--as others 
>>>have suggested--that the simplest thing is to replace it, period.
>>>I'm going to check in with this guy very soon about what I'm 
>>>learning here.
>>>
>>>I'm not familiar with the ozone tent Andrew speaks of.  Any idea 
>>>what it is/does?  Andrew?
>>>
>>>Thanks very much for everyone's help!
>>>Greg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:52 AM, David Skolnik 
>>><<mailto:davidskolnik at optonline.net> davidskolnik at optonline.net> wrote:
>>>Greg, James -
>>>Without getting into technical details beyond my immediate 
>>>knowledge, the data seems somewhat incomplete.  I may have missed 
>>>something, but I don't understand the basis for James assumption 
>>>that the piano suffered water damage.  It would be interesting to 
>>>know the suspected cause of the mold, i.e. a water leak, flooding, 
>>>Humbolt climate?  Does he use the piano?  Can the piano be moved 
>>>to a part of the house that he doesn't frequent, to see if that 
>>>makes a difference?  If his condition suddenly improves, that 
>>>would narrow it down a bit.  I would be wary of going immediately 
>>>the off-site 'expert evaluation' route, partly for the initial 
>>>expense (it can't be cheap, unless the wife does it herself or 
>>>knows someone), and then question of what to do, based upon the 
>>>assessment results.  I suppose you could move it off-site to do a 
>>>thorough cleaning (or take it out in the back on a sunny day - 
>>>whenever that might be- and blow it out).
>>>
>>>It would be interesting to see (photo) how the house has been 
>>>cleansed without eliminating all elements of comfort.
>>>David Skolnik
>>>
>>>At 11:32 AM 1/10/2013, you wrote:
>>>>Greg,
>>>>    Of all the things that are be almost impossible to remove 
>>>> from a piano without rebuilding, mildew and mold are at the top 
>>>> of the list. It is more difficult then smoke and smoke 
>>>> odor  There simply is not a way to clean it out without removing 
>>>> and replacing parts. You have a living organism that is not just 
>>>> sitting there, is is growing  If I were in your place I wold 
>>>> first have the piano removed to a water damage restoration 
>>>> specialist and let is sit in an uncontaminated area for 
>>>> evaluation and then decide the next step from there.  Most of 
>>>> the time you can see it but not always.  Getting the input from 
>>>> some folks that deal with it on a regular basis is helpful.
>>>>Yours
>>>>James Schmitt
>>>>On Jan 9, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Gregory J. Granoff wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>David,
>>>>>I'm not sure what the story is on discovery there, but his wife 
>>>>>is a long time professional allergist, and they have come quite 
>>>>>a distance already in getting rid of all furniture and permeable 
>>>>>surfaces in the house (carpeting, etc.), cleaning, painting, 
>>>>>etc., with no turning back.  I'm not going to say anything about 
>>>>>finding what you tend to look for, if you know what I mean; but 
>>>>>he did develop some pretty unpleasant symptoms when he's in his 
>>>>>house--difficulty regulating body temp, feelings of mild atrophy 
>>>>>in extremities, and mental cloudiness, among others, according to him.
>>>>>The question really is now:  what do with the piano.  He's 
>>>>>aware--assuming that all this other stuff is correct-- that the 
>>>>>piano might need to be replaced entirely, so it isn't a question 
>>>>>of that being do-able if necessary.
>>>>>He just wants to know if that route is the only choice, and if 
>>>>>it isn't, what are the realistic options for the existing piano?
>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>Greg
>>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 5:08 AM, David Skolnik 
>>>>><<mailto:davidskolnik at optonline.net> davidskolnik at optonline.net> wrote:
>>>>>Greg -
>>>>>How was the original mold assessment made?  How is the rest of 
>>>>>his house being treated?  Did a reliable expert locate the 
>>>>>primary source, and reason for its presence?
>>>>>David Skolnik
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>At 12:26 PM 1/8/2013, you wrote:
>>>>>>Hello list,
>>>>>>I'm looking for info regarding a customer who has been 
>>>>>>diagnosed with a serious allergy to poisonous mold spores that 
>>>>>>have apparently infected his house.  He asked me whether there 
>>>>>>was any way to treat permeable surfaces such as felt, 
>>>>>>unfinished wood, etc. in pianos for the spores which can lodge 
>>>>>>there that didn't involve replacing everything.  I have no 
>>>>>>experience with this issue at all.  Anybody know?
>>>>>>Thanks so much in advance for any advice and knowledge!
>>>>>>Greg Granoff
>>>>>>Humboldt State University
>>>>>>No virus found in this message.
>>>>>>Checked by AVG - <http://www.avg.com/>www.avg.com
>>>>>>Version: 2013.0.2805 / Virus Database: 2637/6016 - Release Date: 01/07/13
>>
>>No virus found in this message.
>>Checked by AVG - <http://www.avg.com>www.avg.com
>>Version: 2013.0.2805 / Virus Database: 2637/6021 - Release Date: 01/09/13
>>
>>
>>No virus found in this message.
>>Checked by AVG - <http://www.avg.com>www.avg.com
>>Version: 2013.0.2890 / Virus Database: 2637/6023 - Release Date: 01/10/13
>>
>
>No virus found in this message.
>Checked by AVG - <http://www.avg.com>www.avg.com
>Version: 2013.0.2890 / Virus Database: 2638/6029 - Release Date: 01/12/13

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20130113/342e21a0/attachment.htm>


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC