<html>
<body>
<br>
Hi Paul,<br>
Sorry you are wrong, 243HP is an entirely different scale,
Ask Del. <G> That model has a fanned rib
configuration, plus other subtle improvements. The 743 scale
has parallel ribs two small damper blocks, vs tri damper blocks..
Oh well??????<br><br>
Regards Roger<br><br>
<br>
At 06:06 PM 4/15/2004, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font face="arial" size=2 color="#000080">Complete
correct term is HP-243.<br>
Paul Kupelian<br>
SUNY Oswego (ret.)<br>
<br>
</font><font face="tahoma" size=2>-----Original Message-----<br>
<b>From:</b> caut-bounces@ptg.org
[<a href="mailto:caut-bounces@ptg.org" eudora="autourl">mailto:caut-bounces@ptg.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Otto Keyes<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, April 15, 2004 6:47 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> College and University Technicians<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Baldwin 743 question<br>
</font><font face="Times New Roman, Times"> <br>
</font><font face="arial" size=2>I agree with your last comment
Mark. However, I always thought they were 243's (or perhaps
deserving of an even lower numeric designation). From whence came
this 500 point elevation? For me, these always bore the designation
of "Bald-swine". Only redeeming feature is the lid prop
-- but even that gets in the way of tuning.<br>
<br>
Otto<br>
</font>
<dl>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Please pardon the abscence of optimism, but I find servicing the
743's, beyond tuning, tends to underwhelm even the most meager
expectations. <br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Mark Cramer,<br>
<dd>Brandon University<br>
<dd> <br>
</dl></blockquote></body>
</html>