<html>
<body>
Hi, David,<br><br>
Actually, I was thinking that he meant: <i>rugulose,</i> which
means: finely rugose, having many small wrinkles...which,
considering that action work is indeed finely rugose, made perfect
sense.<br><br>
Best.<br><br>
Horace<br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
At 09:37 AM 9/6/2006, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">redougulouse: as in
re do ugly osis ;-]<br><br>
David Ilvedson, RPT<br>
Pacifica, CA 94044<br><br>
<br>
----- Original message ----------------------------------------<br>
From: "Ric Brekne" <ricbrek@broadpark.no><br>
To: caut@ptg.org<br>
Received: 9/6/2006 7:48:51 AM<br>
Subject: [CAUT] caut Digest, Vol 1090, Issue 6<br><br>
<br>
>Chris Soliday writes:<br><br>
>.......... OR control Friction 8-12 grams, target Balance Weight and
<br>
>DownWeight and<br>
>float the Upweight but make sure it is over 26g ....<br><br>
>Chris, David et al.<br><br>
>This is how I usually go about things, but you can take things a bit
<br>
>further once both strikeweights and frontweights are installed.
(assumes <br>
>balanced frontweights) Once you know both ends of the see-saw you
also <br>
>know that any variations in BW are due to ratio variances. Often you
can <br>
>improve that picture by checking and correcting for small knuckle
<br>
>placement/angle variances and the like. You can end up with pretty
close <br>
>to spec on all parameters if you pick at it long enough...<br><br>
>Course at some point it gets redougulouse and you have to say good
<br>
>enough is good enough..<br><br>
>Cheers<br>
>RicB</blockquote></body>
</html>