<html>
<body>
Israel -<br><br>
Some questions interspersed -<br><br>
<br>
At 06:36 PM 12/17/2006, you wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">What is the length of the tails
and what is the condition of the buckskin?<br>
--<br><br>
Regards,<br><br>
Jon Page</blockquote><br>
Jon,<br><br>
You may be on to something here. So far I had two Steinways with
seemingly "intractable" checking problems - one B at San
Francisco State and one D in a client's home. Everything mentioned on
this list in this thread was tried (and a few more things too),
</blockquote><br>
<font color="#800080">Would you say what those more things were?<br><br>
</font><blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">and nothing seemed to
work. Replacing the backchecks with the Tokiwa- made old-style Steinway
backchecks (longer) cleared up all the problems on both pianos ($150/set,
Pianotek). It seems that on a lot of them the hammer tails are just too
short for the new style, shorter backchecks...<br><br>
Israel Stein</blockquote><br>
<font color="#800080">Israel - As with Wim - you also did not indicate
the manufacturing year of your pianos. It's true that there was a
period when the tails were extremely short, but that's not too recent, in
my experience. If it were only the height of the checks in relation
to the tails, why couldn't you simply raise the backchecks? As an
experiment, it falls short of completely explaining the issue, since
there are undoubtedly differences in a number of characteristics between
the two brands. Can you look at the two side by side and compare
them? <br><br>
David Skolnik</font></body>
<br>
</html>