<html> <body> Boys - I was going to send this off-list, but every subject title I came up with sounded like something my own email program would skim off as spam, so I apologize for the somewhat OT and personalized nature of this post. I do think it may apply to a few other individuals. It is, to be sure, no criticism, so be calm. It's about how  Eudora (my email client) interprets and organizes subject titles in its mailbox listing.  Ric, if you'll recall, I previously pointed out this problem (perhaps relating ONLY to Eudora), in the way the subject appears in the header without the "RE:" .  I originally thought you were re-typing the subject in, but you said that its appearance was a function of replying from mail received in digest form.  I seem to recall that both of you have indicated that you use that option.  Two things occur to make your posts NOT come up with others when grouped by subject.  First, though I think it may not be the real issue, one can usually discern the originating post of a thread, as it is otherwise the only one which does NOT begin with "RE".  When there are more than one appearing that way, it can be confusing.  However, what seems to separate out yours' is the space that appears after "CAUT" in the subject.  You are either doing something manually, or else something is happening automatically to insert extra spaces when you reply.  The result, again in Eudora, is that all these posts go to the top of the listing (separated from all the other posts on that subject) when grouped by subject.   I'm pointing this out a) so that you'll be aware of it, and b) if there is anything that you can do, you might consider it.  I don't want any of your words lost to posterity. Second is to Jon.  I notice a particular phenomenon on a number of your posts.  Quoted passages will appear in very small font, but when I click to reply, the requoted portion appears in extra large font (as below).  Any idea what's happening ? This is all end-of-the-year housekeeping. Happy New Year David Skolnik At 09:21 PM 12/27/2006, you wrote: <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">>I agree on the 2mm bit ... I have thank Andre for that one and the 72 degree angle. Although I assume they are of Yamaha derivative. Why are all the latest 'in-roads' from foreign sources?? S$S too tight-liped?? <pre>-- </pre> Regards, Jon Page</blockquote></body> </html>