<html> <body> Proof accepted, though some assortment of scars, cigars, tattoos, or body piercings would have added credibility. But you still have to break those strings. Nice graphics and lighting though.  DavidS At 05:27 PM 1/11/2007, you wrote: <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Here's proof I am not a wimp.. (you'll love this, Skolnik...) <img src="cid:7.1.0.9.2.20070112061735.02c655e8@optonline.net.1" width=640 height=480 alt="[]"> On Jan 11, 2007, at 4:42 PM, David Skolnik wrote: <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Michelle Now there, don't get bent. That was "child", as in "honey-child".  That, and your tender years, or ears. As far as WIMP, well, if you want to really dispel that appellation, you could go to the limit with Ed Sutton's advice: <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:35:16 -0500 (EST) From: <a href="mailto:ed440@mindspring.com">ed440@mindspring.com</a> Subject: Re: [CAUT] huge pitch raise question A good experiment is to intentionally break strings on a piano that's going to be junked. WEAR EYE PROTECTION.  Tune a string as unison with it's upper neighbor, and the next  upper neighbor, and the next....</blockquote> You can really show'um...pull up those strings on a good piano, and don't wear eye protection. Yeah, now who's a wimp, eh? David S Urtext edition. All smilies expunged At 10:41 AM 1/11/2007, you wrote: <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Awwright now. That's it.. So far I've been called "jerk", now "child" and someone very  important in this group (and to me) even called me a... (prepare  yourself..)  WIMP. :( I will only admit to being a jerk- and there's PLENTY of you on here  I see.</blockquote></blockquote> </blockquote></body> </html>