<HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE>FW: FAC question</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> I thought, for the record, I should share this with the list. ------ Forwarded Message From: Fred Sturm <fssturm@unm.edu> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:33:43 -0700 To: <Dpshans@aol.com> Subject: Re: FAC question On 1/23/07 7:37 PM, "Dpshans@aol.com" <Dpshans@aol.com> wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE>Thanks, Fred, I'll play around with that and see how it goes for me.     Take care,     Dan </BLOCKQUOTE> Hi Dan,     Thinking it over a bit after posting, my memory was a bit off – it needed one more plain wire note to have an offset, and the wrapped strings needed to be a bit lower in offset. The wrapped should be +0.4, +0.3, +0.2 descending by half steps from the top one, with the plain at –0.6, -.04, -0.3, -0.2 ascending from the bottom one (one more altered note in the plain series than I gave earlier). It had been many years since I last thought those numbers through. There’s an interplay between the numbers of the wrapped and plain. Descending, beginning with the M3 which has –0.2 as the additional offset for its bottom note, the M3s are 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.6 wider, then 0.6, 0.6, 0.6, 0.6 narrower (the M3s with wrapped strings on the bottom, plain on top). Then, it jogs to 0.4, 0.3, 0.2 wider. So a total of 11 M3s are affected.     Hope this helps. Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico   ------ End of Forwarded Message </BODY> </HTML>