<HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE>Re: [CAUT] Hammer Suggestions</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> Hey, Rex, Last summer I put a set of Ronsen/Wurzens on an older 45, sn 343xxx, and it came out great.  It went into a small studio, all hard surfaces.  I didn’t do anything but file them.  If it had gone into a bigger room I probably would have juiced the top 1 1/2 octaves or so, but only lightly. Regards, Ken Z. On 3/23/07 10:46 AM, "Rex Roseman" <rosemanpiano@netzero.net> wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE>I have been asked to quote on replacing the hammers in a Steinway Upright (45) serial 512*** that is used in a dance studio. I am seeking advice and opinions on two things.   1.      The dance studios are big new rooms lined with mirrors, windows and cement block walls with dance floors and sheet metal roofing, meaning that there is not a particle of sound absorption to be found. The reverb rate is measured with a calendar. What advice can anyone give about the best sound to try to get from the piano? I had originally thought of a bright piercing sound that would cut through the sonic clutter, but after talking with the accompanists, they like the fuller, rounder sound of the new Boston 118’s that are in some of the other studios. (The Boston’s’ have never been voiced and are as is from the dealer.) I am interested in hearing from anyone who has had experience working in this type of extreme environment. 2.      Considering the information above, what brand of hammer could be suggested for this piano. I am not keen on getting hammers from Steinway as at a recent PTG meeting, their head tech guy said that the upright hammers are delivered needing extensive needling to be usable. From my studies, I am not sure that this is best for hammers or something that I want to commit myself to doing if there is a better hammer out there to be had.   Thank you for your help.   Rex Roseman University of Akron, School of Dance   </BLOCKQUOTE> -- Ken Zahringer, RPT Piano Technician MU School of Music 297 Fine Arts 882-1202 cell 489-7529 </BODY> </HTML>