<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Jim, These hammers won't last
a year or two anyway! They are quite worn out, so I thought there
would be nothing to lose. If they clog up right away, then they will
be summer project number 1!!!</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The other question arising is whether
the chemicals in Downy will be corrosive to the strings. That would
not be good, however, they are pretty old as well. The bottle only states
the ingredients as "biodegradable fabric softening agents (cationic)"
(whatever that means!).. :>()</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Paul</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>"Jim Busby" <jim_busby@byu.edu></b>
</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: caut-bounces@ptg.org</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">03/30/2007 07:30 PM</font>
<table border>
<tr valign=top>
<td bgcolor=white>
<div align=center><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to<br>
College and University Technicians <caut@ptg.org></font></div></table>
<br>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"College and University Technicians"
<caut@ptg.org></font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: [CAUT] Experiment success!</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>List,<br>
<br>
I think I read an article about Downy softener that said the long term<br>
effect wasn't good. It seems it kind of "clogged up" the hammer
so<br>
future voicing was not possible. Anyone know about the long term effect?<br>
(Within a couple of years) The Pianotek stuff isn't supposed to have<br>
adverse effects. I've used it occasionally on marginal hammers with<br>
success.<br>
<br>
Jim Busby BYU<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: caut-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf Of<br>
Willem Blees<br>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 5:26 PM<br>
To: College and University Technicians<br>
Subject: Re: [CAUT] Experiment success!<br>
<br>
Not only is Downey less expensive, it probably smells a lot better <br>
than the hammer softener from Piantek. BTW, does anyone know the <br>
ingredients of this stuff?<br>
<br>
Wim<br>
Willem Blees, RPT<br>
Piano Tuner/Technician<br>
School of Music<br>
University of Alabama<br>
Tuscaloosa, AL USA<br>
205-348-1469<br>
<br>
Quoting Paul T Williams <pwilliams4@unlnotes.unl.edu>:<br>
<br>
> Hi all<br>
> <br>
> Just wanted to give you an update on my hammer softener experiment.
<br>
> It <br>
> ended up being a tie between the Downy softener and the hammer<br>
> softener <br>
> from Protek. Since most of the pianos I worked on have Abel
and<br>
> Renner <br>
> hammers, steaming didn't have a huge effect. One M&H model
A's<br>
> hammers <br>
> are so badly worn (not even enough felt left to file!) that even the<br>
> <br>
> softeners didn't do very much. It's now slated for an action<br>
> overhaul <br>
> this summer.( Abel or Renner? Hmmmmmmm...)<br>
> <br>
> So for cost analysis, the hammer softener is about 75 cents per ounce<br>
> and <br>
> the Downy/Alcohol is about 15 cents/ounce! No brainer. Time
will<br>
> tell <br>
> which will last the longest. <br>
> <br>
> BTW, The mineral spirits ended up working just fine on the Steinway
<br>
> finish.<br>
> <br>
> On to new challenges!<br>
> <br>
> Best to all,<br>
> <br>
> Hei, Hei!<br>
> <br>
> Paul<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</tt></font>
<br>