<html>
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10 (filtered)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
p
        {margin-right:0in;
        margin-left:0in;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.Style1, li.Style1, div.Style1
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:14.0pt;
        font-family:Arial;}
p.style10, li.style10, div.style10
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:14.0pt;
        font-family:Arial;}
span.emailstyle20
        {font-family:Arial;
        color:navy;
        font-weight:normal;
        font-style:normal;
        text-decoration:none none;}
@page Section1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=blue>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>“They are just measuring devices”</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=4 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
14.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=4 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
14.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Exactly and thanks for bring it up.
Yes --- but above all they have to be consistent. I can test
the fundamental of two particular machines but when measuring
“harmonics” the result varies. </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=4 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
14.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Specific mentions should be another
thread….. R Moody </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=4 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
14.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'> </span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>-----Original Message-----<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>From:</span></b> caut-bounces@ptg.org
[mailto:caut-bounces@ptg.org] <b><span style='font-weight:bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b>Keith
Roberts<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> </span></font><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>Sunday, June
10, 2007</span></font><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma'> </span></font><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>7:40 PM</span></font><font size=2
face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'><br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> College and University
Technicians<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> Re: [CAUT] coupled motion
and other myths</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'>I don't get some of this. I see nothing disproved. The
coupled motion thing seems to be an issue of semantics as well as the para
inharmonicity. I also disagree with the statement that tuning devices have
shortcomings, They are just measuring devices and if there is a sound there, it
measures it. How the data is interpreted and used by the operator is where the
shortcomings are. You know, a man can be a 5 time divorcee loser or a man who
is not afraid to make a commitment. Depends on how you word it. </span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'>Keith Roberts<br>
<br>
</span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><span class=gmailquote><font
size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>On </span></font></span><span class=gmailquote>6/10/07</span><span class=gmailquote>, <b><span style='font-weight:
bold'>Remoody</span></b> <<a href="mailto:remoody@midstatesd.net">remoody@midstatesd.net</a>>
wrote:</span> </p>
<div>
<p style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Was posted........<br>
"""The bridge is not a ridged termination. (coupled motion of
piano strings).<br>
If the rigidity changes with humidity then the string may appear longer or <br>
shorter thus affecting pitch. Dean Reyburn refers to this effect as "para<br>
inharmonicity"i.e.""""<br>
<br>
I would like to offer some arguments to disprove the idea of coupled
motion, and para inharmonicity, and to look at inharmonicity in a
new light. <br>
<br>
"Coupled motion" is dispelled when the definition of it is
given. It is not logical, rational, nor holds up to the Scientific
Method of proof by experiment.<br>
<br>
"</span></font><font size=2 face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>Para</span></font><font size=2
face="Courier New"><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'>
inharmonicity" is a myth to explain (or excuse) the short commings
of tuning machines. <br>
<br>
Inharmonicity seems to be a valid scientific phenonenom but
still eludes consistant measurement.<br>
<br>
--Richard Moody<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span></font></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span></font></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>