<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi All</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I just read the Central West Regional
News and Trevor Nelson had some very positive things to say about the sharing
of ideas we all input to fellow guild members. I am proud to be in
an organization which doesn't selfishly hold on to "secrets"
to appear better than another tech. As he states, "It's easy
to forget that in most other parts of the world, such a fertile exchange
of ideas doesn't take place, because our profession is extremely tradition-bound;
or, piano technicians are reticent to share their work "secrets"
with each other... Think of how long it would take one technician to come
up with a better tool or technique, compared to two or four. How
about four hundred? or four thousand?"</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">This subject is facinating to me as
I use the "align my eyeball with the plane of the jack/knuckle, but
as Fred states, to have your "eyeball sighting" not perfectly
lined up the same way every time can indeed skew the result. The
hammers under the pinblock method is tempting and I might try it and then
double check with my eyeball method to see just how much variance of consistancy
shows up. What we all want in the end is a consistant feel for the
pianist. It is he/she that we all really work for.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Best,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Paul T Williams</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">UNL</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Tim Coates <tcoates1@sio.midco.net></b>
</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: caut-bounces@ptg.org</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">08/07/2007 10:48 PM</font>
<table border>
<tr valign=top>
<td bgcolor=white>
<div align=center><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to<br>
College and University Technicians <caut@ptg.org></font></div></table>
<br>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">College and University Technicians <caut@ptg.org></font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: [CAUT] Black on Black... (Jack alignment)</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=3>Fred,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3>I think if you re-read Michael Wathen's comments
he attributes this method to "Garlick". For those who are
too young to remember, that would be Bill Garlick. A person
who used to be a very valuable member of the PTG. </font>
<br>
<br><font size=3>For me, you are wrong about the rapid flick motion.
But you can do that if you want. You know what works best for you.
It's nice to have a good exchange of ideas without one person judging and
insisting they have the only correct answer. </font>
<br>
<br><font size=3>Tim Coates</font>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=3>On Aug 7, 2007, at 7:13 PM, Fred Sturm wrote:</font>
<br>
<br><font size=1 face="Verdana"> I do like Michael
Wathen’s method if it’s used for finding cheating jacks. Very convenient
not to have to hold your finger or hand on each hammer. And I’ll suggest
that a rapid flick motion rather than a hard press is best to find those
borderline cases. Fast as you can, but not necessarily much force, will
find them best.</font>
<br>
<br>