<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <title>RE: [CAUT] SAT numbers</title> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" /> </head> <body> <div align="left">Avery,</div> <div align="left"></div> <div align="left">Couldn't you use the Double Octave feature to bring the stretch in?   Seems to me a few negative notches might bring it into line...I have to admit I've not really explored the DO feature...<br /><br />David Ilvedson, RPT<br />Pacifica, CA 94044<br /><br /></div> <div style="padding-right: 5px; padding-left: 5px; padding-bottom: 5px; border-left: #000000 3px solid; padding-top: 5px" align="left"> <hr />Original message<br />From: "Avery Todd" <ptuner1@gmail.com></ptuner1@gmail.com><br />To: "College and University Technicians" <caut@ptg.org></caut@ptg.org><br />Received: 8/17/2007 6:41:52 PM<br />Subject: [CAUT] SAT numbers<br /><br /> <div align="left">List, </div> <div></div> <div>I have a question about high numbers on F on an SAT III. I tuned two Pearl River UP 115's today (studio size) and one of them had an F number of 15.1 and the other had 14.9. I was getting way too much stretch as I went into the bass so I just ended up tuning them aurally! </div> <div></div> <div>I seem to remember that someone (Fred Sturm?) mentioned some time back that he never uses a number higher than ?????. Am I correct? Or was it someone else? Just wondering what others of you SAT users do in a case like this. BTW, this is a VERY good reason why it's good to also be able to tune aurally!!!!!!! :-) </div> <div></div> <div>Avery Todd</div> </div> </body> </html>