<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">David,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I forgot to mention that there are 6
leads in the lowest bass keys and 5 through the middle and 3-4 three
forths of the rest of the way! Steinways attempt at compensating
I suppose... What I don't understand is why did they mess with a
good thing?</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>"Porritt, David"
<dporritt@mail.smu.edu></b> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: caut-bounces@ptg.org</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">09/21/2007 10:03 AM</font>
<table border>
<tr valign=top>
<td bgcolor=white>
<div align=center><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Please respond to<br>
College and University Technicians <caut@ptg.org></font></div></table>
<br>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"College and University Technicians"
<caut@ptg.org></font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: [CAUT] moving capstans question</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=3 color=#004080 face="Times New Roman">Paul:</font>
<br><font size=3 color=#004080 face="Times New Roman"> </font>
<br><font size=3 color=#004080 face="Times New Roman">I’m certainly not
an action guru but last year I did move a capstan line 6 - 7 mm forward
on a Baldwin SF-10. It made a very nice difference. The DW
had been in the high 60s and it came down to the low 50s and felt much
better. Fortunately with that move the capstan was still in a good
area of the wippen heel so I didn’t have to cut the heels off and move
them.</font>
<br><font size=3 color=#004080 face="Times New Roman"> </font>
<br><font size=3 color=#004080 face="Times New Roman">dave</font>
<br><font size=3 color=#004080 face="Times New Roman"> </font>
<br><font size=2 color=#004080 face="Calibri">David M. Porritt, RPT</font>
<br><a href=dporritt@smu.edu><font size=2 color=blue face="Calibri"><u>dporritt@smu.edu</u></font></a>
<br><font size=3 color=#004080 face="Times New Roman"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Tahoma"><b>From:</b> caut-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces@ptg.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Paul T Williams<b><br>
Sent:</b> Friday, September 21, 2007 9:34 AM<b><br>
To:</b> caut@ptg.org<b><br>
Subject:</b> [CAUT] moving capstans question</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial"><br>
Hi List!</font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> <br>
</font><font size=2 face="Arial"><br>
Happy Friday!</font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> <br>
</font><font size=2 face="Arial"><br>
I am working on a 70's Sty B with a horrible action geometry problem. All
the students and the professor hate playing it and I don't blame them!
The line from key balance hole to wip has the capstan way too low making
the DW close to 70g throughout. It has a renner action and hammers.
the wips and capstans are such that I could relocate the capstans
back by about 3-4mm. Would that make a big enough difference in the
DW? It won't affect the line. I looked at raising the stack, but
there isn't enough room to raise it more than 1-2mm. Should I try
both?</font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> <br>
</font><font size=2 face="Arial"><br>
Also, is the measurement in Steinways made from center of balance rail
hole on the top of the key, or from the back of the key? This is
a new endeavor for me and I don't want to make things worse.</font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">
<br>
</font><font size=2 face="Arial"><br>
Still green in Lincoln,</font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> <br>
</font><font size=2 face="Arial"><br>
Paul</font>
<br>