<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <title>Re: [CAUT] pictures of new key weighting pattern</title> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"/> </head> <body> Unclear on the subject... David Ilvedson, RPT Pacifica, CA 94044 <div style="padding-right: 5px; padding-left: 5px; padding-bottom: 5px; border-left: #000000 3px solid; padding-top: 5px"> <hr/>Original message From: "Andrew Anderson" <andrew@andersonmusic.com> </andrew@andersonmusic.com> To: "College and University Technicians" <caut@ptg.org> </caut@ptg.org> Received: 1/7/2008 2:26:25 PM Subject: Re: [CAUT] pictures of new key weighting pattern I'd be curious why anyone would use that pattern?! At 01:10 PM 1/7/2008, you wrote: <blockquote class="cite" type="cite">List, Thought some of you might like to see these pics.   I just finished plugging over 400 holes(I know that key replacement should have been considered, but it is not possible for this customer), and that was after I left what I hope to be a basic starting weight pattern in the keys.  I just weighed the leads that came out.  To be honest, I was a little dissappointed  they only weighed 15 pounds.  Oh well.  I would be interested, though, to find out where that stands as far as bragging rights go.   Oh.  The key weighing was part of an S&S "B" rebuilding 10 years ago that included Renner Blues on shanks with a 16mm pin to knuckle measurement, pinblock replacement without glueing it in or fitting it to the flange and also pushed the plate back to shorten #88 to about 46 mm, delignit block with VERY tight pins and coils 10 to 12 mm above plate.  This piano is just a joy!  :-(   Back to the grindstone.   Tim Geinert   </blockquote> </div> </body> </html>