<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<STYLE title=owaParaStyle>P {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px
}
</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2604" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff ocsi="x">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>Chris,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>I would have to say more conventional. But
what is the difference? Does "accelerated" make use of the idea that
weights added closer to the balance rail add less inertia?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>tg</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=csolliday@rcn.com href="mailto:csolliday@rcn.com">Chris Solliday</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=caut@ptg.org
href="mailto:caut@ptg.org">College and University Technicians</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, January 07, 2008 6:10
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CAUT] pictures of new key
weighting pattern</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>sorry Tim I just reread your post and see that
you too left in a basic pattern so I guess we are just about equal. Since
yours was an accelerated weigh off made retarded, after you removed the back
leading did you leave a more conventional weigh off pattern, or go with the
accelerated pattern?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Chris</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=geinert@drtel.net href="mailto:geinert@drtel.net">Tim Geinert</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=caut@ptg.org
href="mailto:caut@ptg.org">College and University Technicians</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, January 07, 2008 2:10
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CAUT] pictures of new key
weighting pattern</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>List,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>Thought some of you might like to see these
pics. I just finished plugging over 400 holes(I know that key
replacement should have been considered, but it is not possible for this
customer), and that was after I left what I hope to be a basic starting
weight pattern in the keys. I just weighed the leads that came
out. To be honest, I was a little dissappointed they only
weighed 15 pounds. Oh well. I would be interested, though, to
find out where that stands as far as bragging rights go.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>Oh. The key weighing was part of an
S&S "B" rebuilding 10 years ago that included Renner Blues on shanks
with a 16mm pin to knuckle measurement, pinblock replacement without
glueing it in <U><STRONG><EM>or</EM></STRONG></U> fitting it to the flange
and also pushed the plate back to shorten #88 to about 46 mm, delignit block
with <STRONG><U>VERY</U></STRONG> tight pins and coils 10 to 12 mm above
plate. This piano is just a joy! :-(</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>Back to the grindstone.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>Tim Geinert</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=4></FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>