<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML dir=ltr><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <STYLE title=owaParaStyle>P { MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px } </STYLE> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1605" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff ocsi="x"> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>that's it in motion, and consequently has more weights and mass so "breakaway" is more dramatic.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Chris</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=geinert@drtel.net href="mailto:geinert@drtel.net">Tim Geinert</A> </DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=caut@ptg.org href="mailto:caut@ptg.org">College and University Technicians</A> </DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, January 07, 2008 7:38 PM</DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CAUT] pictures of new key weighting pattern</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>Chris,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>I would have to say more conventional.  But what is the difference?  Does "accelerated" make use of the idea that weights added closer to the balance rail add less inertia?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>tg</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=csolliday@rcn.com href="mailto:csolliday@rcn.com">Chris Solliday</A> </DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=caut@ptg.org href="mailto:caut@ptg.org">College and University Technicians</A> </DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, January 07, 2008 6:10 PM</DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CAUT] pictures of new key weighting pattern</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>sorry Tim I just reread your post and see that you too left in a basic pattern so I guess we are just about equal. Since yours was an accelerated weigh off made retarded, after you removed the back leading did you leave a more conventional weigh off pattern, or go with the accelerated pattern?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Chris</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=geinert@drtel.net href="mailto:geinert@drtel.net">Tim Geinert</A> </DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=caut@ptg.org href="mailto:caut@ptg.org">College and University Technicians</A> </DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, January 07, 2008 2:10 PM</DIV> <DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CAUT] pictures of new key weighting pattern</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>List,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>Thought some of you might like to see these pics.   I just finished plugging over 400 holes(I know that key replacement should have been considered, but it is not possible for this customer), and that was after I left what I hope to be a basic starting weight pattern in the keys.  I just weighed the leads that came out.  To be honest, I was a little dissappointed  they only weighed 15 pounds.  Oh well.  I would be interested, though, to find out where that stands as far as bragging rights go.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>Oh.  The key weighing was part of an S&S "B" rebuilding 10 years ago that included Renner Blues on shanks with a 16mm pin to knuckle measurement, pinblock replacement without glueing it in <U><STRONG><EM>or</EM></STRONG></U> fitting it to the flange and also pushed the plate back to shorten #88 to about 46 mm, delignit block with <STRONG><U>VERY</U></STRONG> tight pins and coils 10 to 12 mm above plate.  This piano is just a joy!  :-(</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>Back to the grindstone.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4>Tim Geinert</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=4></FONT> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>