<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"> <html><head><style type="text/css"></style><title>Re: [CAUT] Bass bridge, string scale, cantilevered bridge,</title></head><body> <div>At 13:18 -0700 3/5/08, Delwin D Fandrich wrote:</div> <div><br></div> <blockquote type="cite" cite><font face="Comic Sans MS"><br> <img src="cid:p06240816c4427db20cd4@[10.0.0.1].1.0" align="left" width="427" height="320" hspace="12"></font></blockquote> <blockquote type="cite" cite> </blockquote> <blockquote type="cite" cite> </blockquote> <blockquote type="cite" cite><br> (Yes, I know I should have used a shorter loop on the bass strings.)<br> </blockquote> <blockquote type="cite" cite>Del</blockquote> <div><br> <br> </div> <div>I'm surprised the finishing coils don't touch the plate where the original bearing was meant to be.  In the contecy of back-lengths, the German eye seems the way to go.  Ibach always used German eyes and Brinsmead uses a double German eye.  If anyone can tell me the advantage of a double German eye over a single, I'd like to know.</div> <div><br></div> <div><br></div> <div><img src="cid:p06240816c4427db20cd4@[10.0.0.1].1.1"></div> <div><br></div> <div><br></div> </body> </html>