<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1611" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>this is pointless, but the point was it wasn't
worth doing anything more than generally recalling it. The point was made that
we were going down the same road and strangely not getting as far as we did the
last time. At least we had a program and a group formed and everyone was
enthusiastic. It was a bit like the football coach giving the pregame pep
talk and all the players were climbing the walls and the coach yells let's get
out there and win one for the... and the locker room door was
locked.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>If there was an issue that was the exact issue. And
this is the last itme I say dead is dead.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Chris Solliday</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=davidskolnik@optonline.net
href="mailto:davidskolnik@optonline.net">David Skolnik</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=caut@ptg.org
href="mailto:caut@ptg.org">College and University Technicians</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, July 19, 2008 6:08
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CAUT] Pianopedia - Good
intentions gone wrong</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>At 11:04 AM 7/19/2008, you quoted me:<BR>><FONT
face="Arial Italic, Helvetica">Explore enhanced / refined search capabilities
/ organizational<BR></FONT>><FONT face="Arial Italic, Helvetica">structure
of existing archives.<BR></FONT>and said:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">All well and good but when does a
topic stay on topic. Usually by the twelfth<BR>reply the subject is
different from the original topic. Would it be any different<BR>on a
'dedicated' topic? Tangently speaking, that ls.</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Jon -<BR>I'm
not sure what you're saying, especially in relation to the part of my post
that you've quoted, in which I was simply wondering if there were
alternate ways in which the existing data could be organized or searched,
(without involving intensive editorial action), or if, in fact, the structure
of that data, as it now exists, is fairly immutable. <BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">Maybe the exact issue is the fact
that you couldn't, (or wouldn't)<BR>easily, refer to the specific previous
discussions you referenced to<BR>sollidayfy the point you were making. David
Skolnik</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>As to the second part (above)- "Maybe...", taken from
Chris's Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:55:36 -0400 post, I thought it was clear
that I would have liked to more easily refer back to the discussion he was
referencing...<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">
<BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">
<DL>
<DD><FONT size=2>Alan M and I and several others tried about 18 months
ago, to the best of my recollection, and I'm not going to search it to
be more precise</FONT> (Chris
Solliday)</DD></DL></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DL></DL><BR>My point was, what, if anything, given the existing data
structure, would have made greater specificity less onerous, for
Chris.<BR><BR>Out of curiosity, I am periodically trying to interact with the
list through the archives, as you do. How, exactly, do you reply from
the archives? If you respond, please either do so privately or change
the subject heading. <BR><BR>Thanks -<BR><BR>David Skolnik<BR>Hastings on
Hudson, NY<BR><BR>At 11:04 AM 7/19/2008, you wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">
<BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">><FONT
face="Arial Italic, Helvetica">Explore enhanced / refined search
capabilities / organizational<BR></FONT>><FONT
face="Arial Italic, Helvetica">structure of existing
archives.<BR></FONT>Maybe the exact issue is the fact that you couldn't,
(or wouldn't)<BR>easily, refer to the specific previous discussions you
referenced to<BR>sollidayfy the point you were making. David
Skolnik</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>All well and good but when does a topic stay on
topic. Usually by the twelfth<BR>reply the subject is different from the
original topic. Would it be any different<BR>on a 'dedicated' topic?
Tangently speaking, that ls.<BR><BR>Regards,<BR><BR>Jon
Page</BLOCKQUOTE><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>