<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; =
charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2>Thanks
again Jon, you have my interest, can we wrestle with the subject a bit =
more
though?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2>As a
critical point, it would seem measuring front weight, strike weight, =
installing
adjustment screws and (perhaps) moving capstans would be more (rather =
than less)
complicated than Chris' method. Afterall, we are merely removing =
surplus
lead "wholesale" (intuitively nonetheless), =
"ballparking"
the springs (within 5 or 6g), then trimming with a single lead =
(slide-scale
fashion).</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2>I've
de-leaded before using a "cancel-weight" method. It is =
quite
accurate, but certainly more time consuming than the =
above.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2>I
appreciate your recommendation Jon, and wonder how much time is involved =
in your
(Stanwood's) approach? </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2>This
repair order as you may recall, was a 1963 B, weighing-off well, but =
playing
poorly, and carrying a whole lot of lead. As the turbo wippen allowed a =
return
to typical leading, provided ideal DW, UW & F with moderate spring =
tension,
and a touch consistant with our favourite pianos, I'm inclined to stick =
with my
original assessment.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2>My
question is whether the (seemingly) large amount of additional work =
required by
NTM will provide a worthy benefit, beyond what the turbo- wippens have =
already
provided? I will rough-in the regulation and get this instrument in-use =
for
awhile. Is it worthwhile to access front weight, strike weight and =
action ratio
in future?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2>Understood, I'm asking the subjective Jon, but appreciate your
opinion. Others as well. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2>BTW,
yes the "D" is back in action, or should I say "the =
action is
back in D? :>)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2>Mark
Cramer, RPT</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2></FONT></SPAN><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT =
color=#0000ff
face=Arial size=2>Brandon University</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2> </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2> </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=630210916-19092000><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial =
size=2>
</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> <A
href="mailto:owner-caut@ptg.org">owner-caut@ptg.org</A>
[mailto:owner-caut@ptg.org]<B>On Behalf Of</B> Jon =
Page<BR><B>Sent:</B>
Monday, September 18, 2000 9:40 PM<BR><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:caut@ptg.org">caut@ptg.org</A><BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: =
turbo-guru speaks<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><FONT size=3>Graduate the =
hammer
Strike Weight and the key Front Weight to spec curves<BR>supplied by =
David.
Key Ratio alteration may also be needed (moving
capstans).<BR><BR>Pre-tension the assist springs to just support the =
wippen
while installing.<BR><BR>Then by adjusting the assist spring =
tensioning
screw, to produce the desired<BR>Balance Weight, it takes about 45 =
minutes
for the keyboard.<BR><BR><BR>I also remove the dog-leg from the =
butterfly
spring with a pair of wire bending<BR>pliers made from lineman =
pliers. In
one operation it introduces a nice curve to<BR>the wire which rides =
the
Teflon nut and places the contact point more towards<BR>the front of =
the wip
giving a longer spring arm.<BR><BR>Jon Page<BR><BR>At 07:05 PM =
09/18/2000
-0500, you wrote:<BR></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE cite type = cite><FONT color=#0000ff face=arial =
size=2>Care
to share with the class Jon?</FONT><FONT =
size=3><BR><BR></FONT><FONT
color=#0000ff face=arial size=2>Mark</FONT><FONT =
face=arial
size=3><BR></FONT>David Stanwood has a much better approach to =
releading
with assist springs<BR>with the benefit of being inertially more =
balanced.<BR>I've been applying his technique for eight years =
and the
method explained<BR><FONT size=3>below seems much more
complicated.</FONT><BR><FONT size=3>Jon =
Page</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<DIV>Jon Page, piano technician</DIV>
<DIV>Harwich Port, Cape Cod, Mass.</DIV>
<DIV><A href="mailto:jonpage@mediaone.net" EUDORA =
=
AUTOURL>mailto:jonpage@mediaone.net</A></DIV>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=
~~~~~~~~~~~~
</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>