<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" = xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" = xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; = charset=us-ascii"> <meta name=ProgId content=Word.Document> <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10"> <meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Word 10"> <link rel=File-List href="cid:filelist.xml@01C5313B.2B5D8D70">  <style>  </style>  </head> <body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=blue = style='tab-interval:.5in'> <div class=Section1> Hi = Joe,<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> No, the holes aren’t = consistent. In fact, if you insert a “CF” tool you see that sometimes the = hole is oblong from top to bottom and sometimes it is oblong side to side. I’m = not sure what’s happening. <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> I know how to fix it, I’m = just wondering why it is that way, and frankly, our church buys thousands of = these and I’m in a position to influence them. = <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Regards,<o:p></o:p></p= > Jim<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> -----Original = Message----- From: = caut-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces@ptg.org] On = Behalf Of Joe And Penny Goss Sent: Friday, March 25, = 2005 12:47 PM To: College and = University Technicians Subject: Re: [CAUT] = Pulley keys. <o:p> </o:p> <div> Hi,<o:p></o:p>= </div> <div> Any chance they forgot to = chance drill sizes at the factory?<o:p></o:p> </div> <div> If all are the same = oversize this seems like a posibility.<o:p></o:p> </div> <div> Joe Goss RPT Mother Goose Tools <a href="mailto:imatunr@srvinet.com">imatunr@srvinet.com</a> <a = href="http://www.mothergoosetools.com">www.mothergoosetools.com</a><o:p= ></o:p> </div> <blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid black = 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt; margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'= > <div> ----- Original Message = ----- <o:p></o:p> </div> <div style='font-color:black'> From:</span= > <a href="mailto:jim_busby@byu.edu" title="jim_busby@byu.edu">Jim = Busby</a> <o:p></o:p> </div> <div> To:<= /font> <a href="mailto:caut@ptg.org" title="caut@ptg.org">College and = University Technicians</a> <o:p></o:p> </div> <div> Sent:</span= > Friday, March 25, 2005 10:44 AM<o:p></o:p> </div> <div> Subject:</s= pan> RE: [CAUT] Pulley keys.<o:p></o:p> </div> <div> <o:p> </o:p> </div> List, (especially Don M.)<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p= > We just bought 9 new UST7s and all the keys are pulley! Not a huge amount, = but not acceptable. I wanted to size them but the pins are smaller than what I = have on hand. (.125 ??)  However, just to let you know = how big the holes were some of the Yamaha pins would fit = (.137)<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p>= My = question is, has anyone else noticed this, and am I being too nitpicky. (since = this is only a vertical for heaven’s sakes…) Does this amount of “pully-ness” really make that much of a difference in an = upright used mainly for non majors?<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p>= Thanks,<o:p></o:p></p= > <o:p> </o:p>= Jim = Busby RPT<o:p></o:p> BYU<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p>= <o:p> </o:p>= </blockquote> </div> </body> </html>