<html>
<body>
Garret & others,<br><br>
The recent discussion titled "Capo bars", which extended from
1/28 to 2/02, was attempting to address both etymology and consistency
of nomenclature. Of the first I have nothing to add, however,
looking into the second proved illuminating.<br><br>
At 04:11 PM 1/31/2004 -0500, Garret wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Del wrote: There is a drawing in
one of my PT Journal articles illustrating what I mean.<br><br>
Does someone know off hand what PT Journal issue that was?<br><br>
Garret</blockquote><br>
You may have already found this information, but I don't see that anyone
replied to your request on list. I believe the article Del was
referring to was in the August 1995 issue, titled "The Designer's
Notebook-- Front Duplex Stringing Scales". This was a second
installment, the first having appeared in the June issue, and both being
in response to a round-table discussion regarding capo d'astros which
appeared in the February 1995 issue. <br><br>
There seems to be some confusion regarding the term capo d'astro and capo
tastro. I hadn't previously come across <i>capo tastro, <br>
</i>and, in any case, the element seems most often simply referred to as
"capo bar". <br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><b><i>Delwin D Fandrich
<fandrich@pianobuilders.com></i></b> wrote: <br>
The capo tastro bar and the V-bar are two different things even if they
are most often part of the same casting. The capo-tastro bar is formed in
the bottom part of the mold, the V-bar in the top. </blockquote><br>
Vince Myrkalo then asked:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 17:47:26
-0800 (PST)<br>
From: madelyn mrykalo <madvinmryk@yahoo.com><br>
Subject: RE: Capo bars<br>
<br>
Is there a difference between capo tastro and capo
d'astro?</blockquote><br>
and Del (I think) sent the following:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 08:25:13
-0800<br>
From: Delwin D Fandrich <fandrich@pianobuilders.com><br>
Subject: RE: Capo bars</blockquote><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite><font face="Comic Sans MS" color="#0000FF">According
to Giraffes, Black Dragons, and Other Pianos by Edwin M. Good (Second
Edition, 2001. Published by the Stanford University Press, ), capo d'
astro is essentially a meaningless term (at least as applied to the
piano) meaning "cap of the star." In other words it was a
marketing term. Capo tastro is Italian for "cap of the key"
which at least has some relationship to a component of the piano.
Probably a more meaningful term would be "capotasto," also from
Italian, meaning "head of the fingerboard." (According to the
Merriam-Webster 11th Collegiate
Dictionary.)</font></blockquote><br><br>
<br>
I found the Steinway patent # 170,646 (C.F. Theodore Steinway - October
20, 1875) titled "Improvement in Agraffes For Piano-Fortes"
relevantly interesting in this matter. It's actually a patent for
individual capodastro. These were like large brass machine
thread screws which were installed from beneath into what Steinway
referred to simply as a transverse bar. The wide slot in the head
of this screw then received a round steel "face", which
was hammered into place, He claimed this modification
"<i>reduced the width of the bearing surfaces of the capodastros ...
and at the same time the strings are prevented from wearing into the
faces of the capodastros."</i> It seems that he
was referring to the capodastro as the member that <i>would normally</i>
be contacting the strings, like the V bar. Does anyone know whether
any pianos were actually produced with this feature? <br><br>
<br>
David Skolnik<br><br>
<br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
</body>
</html>