<html>
<body>
caut:<br>
<pre>><snip>$300 for credentials (if they really are
credentials) is not that high.
<snip> but if this is your profession it's not that much.
</pre><font face="Courier New, Courier">Dave<br>
</font>p-tech><br>
<pre>>Rgulation is not one of my strong areas.
Regards,
, RPT
It damn well better be if one sports the 'qualification' of
"technician"!
For it to be a true professional qualification one would need periodic
re-examination
to prove tuning/technical ability. Electricians and plumbers have to
re-license.
Granted there are not the same safety issues but still qualifying one's
ability
to tune and regulate is important for credibility.
It seems by many statements I heard that the bar for RPT is too low.
If retested, how many RPT's would not requalify or even want to pay to
have this
bonified certification.
</pre><font face="Courier New, Courier">Jon Page</font></body>
</html>