<DIV>
<DIV>Just now catching up with my mail. <IMG src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/34.gif"> </DIV>
<DIV>Well, I was indeed talking about moi of the key. But as ric said, it is after strike weight/front weight (Stanwood) and friction have been addressed. What I have concerned myself with is releading so that the moi due to the leads is quite smooth from one end to the other. Maybe it is too fine a point to be concerned with, but I am still unsure about that, especially when dealing with concert instruments. I have a spread sheet I use to plug in lead distances to get what moi I want (in gcm2). At the same time, I shoot for certain front weights which is independent of moi). It goes quite quickly if i start with unleaded keys. <BR><BR><B><I>James Ellis <claviers@nxs.net></I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Yes, Vince, evening out down-weight, up-weight, balance weight, and<BR>friction, as felt at the keys, does make a big difference to pianists. I<BR>have done it many times. But in your case, are you sure you are talking<BR>about "moi" (moment of inertia), and not something else? If so, please<BR>tell me how you go about evening out total action "moi" while working only<BR>with the keys?<BR><BR>Sincerely, Jim Ellis<BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives</BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><BR>Vince Mrykalo<br>University of Utah<p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
Yahoo! Hotjobs: <a href="http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/hotjobs/mail_footer_email/evt=21482/*http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus">Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes</a>