<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; =
charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2769" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hi Joel,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>No, these centers were all Teflon =
with
regular, not very good quality knuckles. The pianos were from 1969 =
and the
early 70s. I just remembered I used the old inventory cards from IWU for =
my
Christmas mailing list, so I could look up their serial =
numbers. Of
course, I moved when things got interesting--the full time, with =
benefits staff
position had been approved AND a piano replacement and rebuilding =
program was
put in place. (I had also put the inventory list on a
computer.)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial =
size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>My question is what caused the =
heavy
touchweight in the Teflon actions. Alan mentioned the problem of =
measuring
because of resistance (interia?). Was there anything
else? </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial =
size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>We have a 1920s B here at Braden =
Auditorium that
got a new action sometime during the Teflon era! =
It's
heavy and I believe I will be getting permission soon to replace the
action. If I have time, I'll take a close look at the geometry of =
those
parts.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Barbara Richmond, RPT</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Braden Auditorium (not part of =
the School
of Music at)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Illinois State University
:-)</FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=jajones2@wisc.edu href="mailto:jajones2@wisc.edu">Joel A. =
Jones</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=caut@ptg.org
href="mailto:caut@ptg.org">College and University Technicians</A> =
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, November 14, 2005 =
12:53
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CAUT] Teflon and =
felt
bushings</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Barb <BR><BR>Would you have had some of the early =
transition to
teflon pianos <BR>at IWU containing the felt knuckles? UW-Madison had =
this
situation with<BR>Steinway of the late 60's early 70's. I'm guessing =
there may
be <BR>some of those set-ups still in the field. <BR><BR>We boxed the =
hammer
assembly and sent back to Steinway <BR>where the new knuckles were =
replaced.
They did a great<BR>service to our 40 grands, but I knew of other =
pianos
<BR>that didn't get the factory repair. <BR><BR>Problem came from the =
knuckles
deforming and not remaining<BR>round. Replaced with the traditional =
knuckle
the actions worked<BR>very well. The teflon was not replaced. =
<BR><BR>Is that
what you were asking about? <BR><BR>Joel<BR>Joel Jones, =
RPT<BR>Madison,
WIl<BR>On Nov 14, 2005, at 12:25 PM, Barbara Richmond wrote:<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>Fred,<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller><?/fontf=
amily></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <BR><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>Ah.
When I started at IWU, I followed a technician who was hard of =
hearing--so
he couldn't hear the Teflon clicking the faculty complained =
of. His
solution was to pin everything fairly tight. =
<wince>
Anyway, I repinned the worst of them, but they were still on the =
heavy
side. There was no rebuilding budget at the time (and David =
Stanwood
was just coming out with his touchweight stuff when I moved away). =
I
simply said that I had done what I could until the action could be =
replaced.<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller><?/fontfamily></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <BR><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>So,
if there isn't a touchweight issue with a Teflon repetition and =
a felt
hammer flange, the bulk of the problem must be in the hammer
shank/flange. Did the knuckle mounting distance change from =
Teflon to
felt or was it just the nature of the Teflon? Or, did the =
knuckle size
change (or =
whatever)?<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller><?/fontfamily></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <BR><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>Barbara
Richmond<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller><?/fontfamily></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <BR><?fontfamily><?param =
Arial><?smaller><?x-tad-smaller>PS
Following someone who cannot hear and won't admit it, is =
rough. He
also over-tightened screws--again to compensate for not being able =
to hear
such clicking. Dealing with broken damper wire set screws was =
my least
favorite job.<?/x-tad-smaller><?/smaller><?/fontfamily></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>