<HTML><HTML>In a message dated 3/17/2004 2:39:0= 1 PM Central Standard Time, kswafford@earthlink.net writes: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT= : 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">However, achieving certificatio= n as a PTG tuning examiner is an accomplishment worthy of note on a resume, even if only to document one's service commitment to the community of piano techs. I see neither how a simple statement of such fact worded similarly to the previous sentence could possibly be prohibited, nor any prohibition ever be enforced. </BLOCKQUOTE> It may well be an accomplishment worthy of note, but my understanding of the= original intent was that it was not to be noted. Does this turn on the "pub= lic-ness" of use in public? Perhaps. From a practical point of view, you are= certainly right that enforcement can only be accomplished by peer pressure,= and in the proper education of CTE's as they train. Is the "ethic" of being= CTE part of the training? Just curious. Paul</HTML>