<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [CAUT] Sacrifice (was tuners- technology)</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Verdana">On 3/4/05 3:54 PM, "Otto Keyes" <okeyes@u=
idaho.edu> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial">Fred, et all,<BR>
</FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial">This was what I was getting at in =
a previous response to the "jumpiness..." thread which this evolve=
d from. -- see snip below -- I must admit though, that I don't recall =
Virgil's assertion, or Jim C's experimentation. Since I'm constantly c=
hecking over the S&S D's (used for everything, since we have no dedicate=
d hall or instruments), I have their tunings stored in Tunelab (formerly SAT=
& then RCT). Running through the pianos checking open unisons aga=
inst the stored tuning I often found the unison clean, but drifting slightly=
, so would check individual strings, only to find them individually "in=
tune". Aural checks confirmed the solidity of the tuning, but th=
e EDT still saw the un-muted unison as drifting slightly. Always wonde=
red about that, so this thread has been interesting.<BR>
</FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana"> <BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial">Otto<BR>
</FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana"> <BR>
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Verdana"><BR>
Hi Otto,<BR>
This has been my experience as well over the years:=
often a lovely sounding unison, all three individual strings “dead on=
” according to the display, unison played with all strings open gives =
a display that is creeping one direction or the other. And “one direct=
ion or the other” seems fairly random. No pattern saying it is more of=
ten flat than sharp, in my experience.<BR>
More recently, I have become more finicky (and just=
plain curious) and have investigated further. And I have often found that, =
where the unison read in tandem is creeping, if I look more carefully at ind=
ividual strings I can detect a slight movement in that direction in one or m=
ore of them. Sometimes it is far less apparent than what the whole unison is=
showing. But if I correct the individual string, the display for the unison=
is also corrected. And the unison sounds that wee bit better, too.<BR>
Part of my unison technique in using the ETD involv=
es watching the display while tuning the additional strings to the first. I =
find that the display seems more likely to follow whichever string is farthe=
r from right on. So if my first string was really solid, the next string wil=
l also be solid when I get the display to stop again with both strings sound=
ing. <BR>
I don’t mean to get overly rhapsodic about ho=
w great and easy it is to tune a perfect unison with an ETD. That’s no=
t my intent at all. It’s just that I use that tool as an indispensible=
part of my unison tuning process. I’m responding to a couple folks wh=
o said, more or less, that ETD’s don’t work for tuning unisons. =
In my experience they do work. But it ain’t easy. It’s never eas=
y to tune a really good, solid unison. Hearing and figuring out where pitch =
should be is the easy part. The unisons are the hard part, and nothing makes=
them easy. Except lowering your standards <g>.<BR>
Regards,<BR>
Fred Sturm<BR>
University of New Mexico <BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>