Vince wrote: >> . . . isn't it approaching negligibility?<< I haven't used David's method of measuring the ratios yet, but the change from 11mm to 9mm is enough (on the Steinway and Young Chang actions I have done it to) to require about 2mm extra hammer travel with no change in key dip. In many pianos this works out very well, but it can cause problems in others. Perhaps this is not enough leverage change to fully compensate for the lost mass in the hammers. Lowering the overall mass of the system by removing mass at the hammers and in the keys does add up to easier fortissimo playing, which may compensate further by allowing the pianist to accelerate the hammers to a higher velocity. I prefer to build tone in this sort of bass-akwards way - if the hammers are heavy and soft, before working with the felt to build tone I evaluate whether the piano could benefit from lighter hammers, and look at the action - key stick ratio, knuckle / jack / spread line alignment, friction, etc., to see if I should change the knuckles or capstans. After I'm satisfied with the action, then I'll weigh off the keyboard correctly and finally go to work on the hammers. Generally I've done this in a seat of the pants manner, and I did screw up a few actions in the past when my learning curve was a little more steep. David Stanwood's approach promises to give a more exact procedure for making decisions on how to proceed with a particular piano, and I'm all for it. Don_Mannino@yca.ccmail.compuserve.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC