I have been reading the discussions of action-related issues with great interest. Up to now all my computer time has been occupied by reading and sorting the volume of information generated by this forum, but when time allows, I will submit a discription of my own (somewhat divergent) model which I have devised to describe action phenomena. In the meantime, I have noticed a number of references to the "scientific" investigations which have been taking place. I would like to suggest that the investigations described are not scientific. The goal of science is to describe the universe in terms of >reproducible< phenomena. This means reproducible in other places by other people. The fact that there does not seem to be a consensus on even the most elementary observations of actions would indicate that the reproducibility requirement is not being met. There is another requirement of the "scientific method" which is apparently not being met: the >isolation of variables<. This means, "Measure one thing while everything else remains unchanged," and is, perhaps, the most fundamental principle of the scientific method. Some reflection on this point will indicate that science presents a very skewed view of the universe; there are many things (perhaps including piano actions) which simply have too many variables to isolate and measure them. Thus, the scientific method is more useful for some things than for others. Attempts to employ the scientific method improperly result in descriptions of >special cases< with little or no general application. It may be that every piano ever made is its own special case. Solving action problems to the extent of producing consistent and predictable results may require seeing through the mounds of data to a deeper level of understanding. Bob Hohf
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC