Dear Jim, Responding to your post or any post in a timely manner is almost next to impossible for me, so please forgive me. Now that school is over and the mountain bike race season is done I hope to have a chance to read some mail. It will sure be a welcome change to going over the handle bars and faceplants in the dirt. I certainly appreciate and am humbled by your reference to me in your article. Of course I am one of those who has been advocating this stretch to the limit tuning style since a few years ago and truly the acknowledgement goes to Franz Mohr and the techs at Steinway Hall for coaching me on this at that time. There is a limit on how fast a fourth should be allowed to beat and on concert grands I have generally found it to all work out within reason, however the tuning I just completed this morning re-confirmed a critical area on the Steinway "D" exists between notes #67 and #76. In my opinion, the speed of the 17ths thru this range will make or break the difference between an exciting and brilliant top end or a sound that becomes edgy and brittle. Just being a hair too fast is worse to me than slightly slower than ideal. Can you really dial this in now with the SAT? I know we have had this discussion in the past and being the diehard you know I am it may be time to "show me the money" again. As accurate as the machine is you will have to just set me down and prove that it can not only measure frecuency but also perceive and anticipate beat relationships which is the level of tuning I think goes beyond the SAT. If for no other reason I think the art of tuning cannot be completely measured, absolutely very closely measured, just not completely. I guess I will never understand why technicians are not driven to exercise their minds with the challenges that tuning by ear requires. But wait, you also know that I am buying an SAT for the department as soon as possible. The three advantages I do not aurally possess are accurate pitch corrections, the ability to tune two instruments together, and confidence with pitch perception on notes #86, 87, and 88. Thanks again for your worthy contributions to the list. Those out there in the earlier stages of their tuning careers should feel quite lucky you are sharing so much of your time with us. Brent ==== Brent Fischer, Piano Technician School of Music, Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona 85287-0405 602/965-6760 FAX 602/965-2659 Msg 602/965-3371 http://www.asu.edu/cfa/music/
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC