On Sun, 30 Nov 1997 Billbrpt@aol.com wrote: > A few weeks ago, there were a nember of people who were taking quite > some delight in trashing the reputation of Dr. Stevens and certain of the > techniques described in this book. While I noted that the book was basically > obsolete, I did not see any value in what was being said about it in such a > negative manner. Actually, if you go back and check the origin of the thread on Dr. Stevens, it had nothing whatsoever to do with his book. One of the techs on this list received a solicitation from the good Dr. that said that if he would submit $65.00 plus a TAPE RECORDING of a piano he had tuned, he would receive in exchange from the doctor a certificate proclaiming the technician a "master tuner". I believe the tech who received the solici- tation as Barrie Heaton. Barrie wrote to the list, inquiring about who the "Dr." was and expressing concerns about a technical certification by mail approach. As well he might. Such a "diploma mill" for tuners is HIGHLY suspect and, in effect, demeans the efforts of pioneers like John Travis who did so much to establish verifiable standards of com- petence and ethics aamong members of the craft. In my opinion a person can rant and rave all he wants to about how it would be unfair to the poor doctor to openly criticize his master tuner certification program by mail, but I said that I thought it stinks back then and I am still of that opinion now. The next step would be to have a tech regulate and voice a grand action and then send the Dr. a couple of still photographs of the completed action--PLUS the appropriate fee, of course--and receive back a certificate proclaiming them a "master tone-regulator". By promoting such a scheme, the Dr. doesn't need anyone to "trash" his reputation, he does it to himself. However, if you'd like to argue in favor of a technical-certification-of-tuners-and-technicians-by-mail program, feel free to do so. Les Smith lessmith@buffnet.net
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC