In a message dated 6/2/98 5:56:52 PM Central Daylight Time, tkeenan@kermode.net writes: <<the two (simplest) ways I have just mentioned on your hypothetical instruments would not work. Tim Keenan >> I thank you for your time but I can only reiterate what I said in the previous post. Before you declare something impossible, you should at least try it first. While I am pleased that you are not one of those who is eager to jump on my back insisting that ET is the only, always was and always shall be the only, possible and useful temperament, I must respectfully say that there is something wrong with your conclusions. Unfortunately, it sounds a little too much like all the things I've heard about pianos and how such and such temperament "couldn't work" and "wouldn't work" yet when real music is played with it, it turns out to be a fascinating enhancement. I have given those guitar specifications to many people and none have said what you did. They only said how good it sounded. If you, as a guitarist, alter your tunings a bit from strictly ET so that certain harmonies sound sweeter, you are essentially doing what I described here. You have to remember that in order to be "equal" you cannot have any variation of any kind. If you claim that what I hypothesized "wouldn't work" then you would have to say that whatever you do "wouldn't work" either. Yes, there is a limit to how far one could alter the guitar's tempering before normal playing would become unacceptable but I don't think my figures are at that limit. I did not comment on the other styles of tuning you mentioned because they did not involve the issue of ET vs. WT. I have observed that many people tune their guitars by making solid unisons with a fret and open string as you describe. It seems logical to them but it, in fact, creates a Pythagorean style tuning in which all the 3rds and 6ths are very wide. Some Country & Western performers, especially the Cajuns in Louisiana like that kind of sound. If you do not have an SAT and would like to approximate the 1/6 comma ditonic WT by ear, here is how you would do it: Tune A2 to the fork. Tune E4 to A2 first a pure 12th, then flatten E4 until it beats at 1 strong beat per second. Tune E2, a double octave to E4, as wide as possible without creating a noticeable beat. Check the 4th, E2-A2 for about 2 beats per second. Tune D3 to A2 first a pure 4th, then sharpen D3 until it beats 2 beats per second. Tune B3 to E4 first a pure 4th, then flatten B3 until it beats 2 beats per second. Listen to the 6th, D3-B3. It should beat gently, 3-4 beats per second. Tune G3 to D3 first a pure 4th, then sharpen G3 until it beats 2 beats per second. Check the 3rd, G3-B3. It should beat gently, 3-4 beats per second, exactly the same as the 6th, D3-B3. If these checks don't agree, tweek your intervals, evening them out until they do. Now, as a musical test, play your favorite music normally. Avoid trying to "prove" that this will "not work" (the way piano tuners like to "prove" that a WT or other HT "won't work" by "banging" on the intervals they think sound "sour"). In other words, play normal musical contexts,whatever they might be,donot try to find obscure intervals and play them out of context. Even in ET,you cannot have a pure unison on a fretted six-string guitar unless you tune in Pythagorean intonation. Absolute purety of a unison or octave does not have the same importance or value on the guitar as it does on the piano. It doesn't between other intruments or voices either. I think you will find that a real musical context will indeed work. If you think this idea is perhaps good but simply goes too far, you can try the "Victorian" version. As you can see by the digital information, all of the tempereing is cut in half from the 1/6 ditonic comma WT. Your 12th and 4ths will beat just a little more than in ET. Your 3rd and 6th will beat more gently than in ET, a slightly "sweeter" sound. I hope you discover something that really pleases your ear. Bill Bremmer RPT Madison,Wisconsin
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC