No, WE do not decide. the customer decides. There are a few jazz musicians around here who prefer the ETD's to aural tuning. Go figure. They like the really stretched trebles, I guess. Jon Page Harwich Port, Cape Cod, Mass. (jpage@capecod.net) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ At 07:12 PM 6/16/98 -0400, you wrote: >Gregory Torres wrote: >> I find personally that when comparing a machine tuning with an aural one I >> found the aural more "sweet". Maybe the ETD tunings are "technically" more >> accurate but I personally will tune aurally when faced with a nice >> instrument and am not pressed for time. JMHO > >We should be able to measure the 'sweet' tuning, compare it to the 'dry' >technically accurate one, and determine what it is that makes the >'sweet' one better . . . . IF we can all agree it's better. If we >agree, then that becomes the new model. > >Everything we do . . . . regulation, tuning, voicing . . . . . can be >measured for the sake of comparison. > >Carl > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC