In thinking about what good it would be to know the total moment of inertia of a key together with all its action parts, here is what I concluded. The comparison of down-weight and up-weight tells us how much binding there is in the action centers. This type of thing can go wrong for various reasons: pins too tight in the felt, verdigris, high humidity. Each of these has its own treatment. But what could cause a "bad" moment of inertia? Well, to be honest, I couldn't think of anything except bad initial design. I suppose that a piano might have been given the wrong hammers, or perhaps a hammer for the wrong note. But the inertia is determined mostly by the geometry and the weights involved. It is not affected by things that go wrong gradually in a piano. So I don't suppose that measuring moment of inertia will ever turn out to be as important a diagnostic tool as measuring down-weight and up-weight. But perhaps in a piano factory, just to make sure that the assemblers put the right parts in, it might be useful to have inertia measured. And in a piano factory, such an instrument could be used on many more pianos, thus justifying its probable high cost. It might also be useful if an artist complains that a piano is "hard to play". If the static weights and the inertia are all measured, one might be able to either confirm the artist's complaint, or else show that he is full of hooey. Bob Scott Ann Arbor, Michigan
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC