perplexing problem

Greg Newell gnewell@EN.COM
Tue, 08 Sep 1998 00:05:04 +0000


Dear Liszt,
	I just ran across a real puzzler for me.  If you feel so
inclined I would greatly appreciate your advice.
	I began today to regulate the action of an S&S "B".  I began
as we all do with an inspection/evaluation of all parts and found,
much to my dismay that key leads had been removed in over half the
keys.  In all cases the lead removed was the one closest to the
balance rail.  When these leads were removed the holes were not
plugged but rather left open.  My feeling is that I must , at the
very least, plug the holes with suitable wood.  I am however unsure
now as to what else I may run in to with this action.  What I thought
was going to be a simple regulation now may turn out to be much more.
 If you were to run in to this kind of situation, and I'm sure that
someone has, what else would you look for and how would YOU proceed? 
Thsis job has already been quoted , etc., etc., and I feel that I
could go ahead and charge extra within the proposal for plugging but
reweighing, (something I've not done before), couldn't be worked in
to a nominal increase over the original estimate.  Have you any idea
why someone would elect to remove leads and not plug the holes?  Can
I assume that these leads were removed for a legitamate reason or
should I take the position now of not trusting anything and proceed
from a point of "all bets are off" and strike a new deal with the
group paying for this work?  Am I being too paranoid?
			perplexed in Ohio

				Greg Newell 
Greg and Mary Ellen Newell
Greg's Piano Forte`
Lakewood, Ohio 44107
gnewell@en.com




This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC