Hi, Andy & Chris I think, in your place, that I'd choose to >buy some new butts and "convert" the action to a 'flange type"(it is >possible I think) it does need new butts and hammers anyway. I wouldn't go with the normal (pretty lousy) supply house butts and flanges. I'd probably either buy them from Renner or from Yamaha or from Kawai. I'd choose a hammer compatible with the age and type of piano, probably a cold press hammer like Ronsen. I'd work to make the weight compatible with the original hammers, and I'd consider tapering the sides of the hammer tails progressively in the upper treble, which I've often seen on decent old uprights with good-sounding trebles. If you're going to go to all this work, you might as well pay a little more for parts, and end up with a good quality result. Good flanges should stand up to the strains from mechanical playing. The great tone says that it is fit for the effort. Susan At 12:45 PM 9/14/98 -0500, Andy wrote: >Hi >I just acquired a nice old Baldwin Ellington upright, A very pretty tiger >Oak piano, great tone. it was Free and now I know why. > >This piano will most likely become a orchestration (I make all the >components myself but the spoolframe) so it will most likely get some hard >use. > >The piano action has a brass hammer butt flange, YUCK! and some hammers are >falling out and getting loose. its terrible! This is the first Baldwin >upright I have ever seen with this type of hammer mounting all the rest I >have seen have flanges! > >I have a few choices to make and I am in need of advice. > >repair the brass rail? >replace the brass rail? >buy some new butts and "convert" the action to a 'flange type"(it is >possible I think) it does need new butts and hammers anyway. >forget this piano and choose another? > >Thanks in advance >Andy Taylor >PPD....(player piano dude) > > > Susan Kline P.O. Box 1651 Philomath, OR 97370 skline@proaxis.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC