>I think though that some people will suggest that tuning ET is > harder than tuning just or meantone. > > I believe on this question we must defer to tuners with experience and > knowledge of tuning these temperaments by ear. They would be able to tell > us what is easy or hard to tune. I hope I am wrong but it seems the only temperament that has "survived" to be passed on directly to us is ET. Meantone appears to have died out by 1900. For a tuner today to tune Meantone he would have to be self taught. Which is OK if that is all that can be had. If there is a tuner who tunes Meantone from the Aural tradition who was taught by another tuner who learned from another tuner and so on back into the 1800's, that would be someone I would travel far and wide to meet. In this current interest of historical temperaments, I find it curious that Meantone does get much mention. Yet it is probably the temperament WTC was tuned away from. "The temperament of the Classical period" it has been said. The following is opinion only, presented because of the forum aspect of this list, for peer review in other words. I believe there two "species", if you will, of temperaments; Meantone, and Well. ET evolved from Well. Meantone is its own distinct branch. Meantone provided the keyboard player with pure thirds (up to 8 !) but a limited amount of key signatures to play in. The Wells especially that which was used in WTC, had little or no objective of pure thirds, rather offered six or less pure fifths and compressed (tempered) the remaining fifths to make a chromatic keyboard octave that could play in all keys. ET succeeded in tempering them all, so much so that they (5ths) sound pure in music. The thirds in ET are sharp and "beat" but that is perceived as pleasant. just as singers or vioilins use vibrato when playing sustained thirds. The interest of pure thirds seems to have been in the pipe organs. Also its effects on the triads played as chords. But this now becomes the scope of music theory---how the music sounds different and why. William Braid White the man Jorgensen credits with ET as we (tuners tune it) know it in the 20th century writes in "Piano Tuning and Allied Arts" (5th ed) "At any rate, the Mean-Tone Temperament ought to be kept alive if only because it was the Temperament of the classical age of music, furnishing the intonation to which the earlier classical masters were accustomed and that they had "in their ears" when they were writing their works. It must not be forgotten that the Mean-Tone Temperament was worked out {"early years of the 16th century"..p.237} during that stage of musical development when composition was based on the principle of Tonality. The men of that age would have been horrified at the thought of considering the musical scale to be twelve equal semitones! Such a conception now practically realized in the universally adopted Equal Temperament would have been quite foreign to their ideas. This fact explains the curious gaps and limits of Mean-Tone" p. 244 Richard Moody
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC